Assess Urban Geo-Hazards: A New Ground-Airborne Geophysical Instrumental Facility

References

1. Angelopoulou, T., Chabrillat, S., Pignatti, S., Milewski, R., Karyotis, K., Brell, M., Ruhtz, T., Bochtis, D., and Zalidis, G. [2023] Evaluation of airborne hyspex and spaceborne PRISMA hyperspectral remote sensing data for soil organic matter and carbonates estimation. Remote Sensing, 15 (4), 1106.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arboleda-Zapata, M., Osterman, G., Li, X., Sasidharan, S., Dahlke, H. E., and Bradford, S. A. [2025] Time-lapse ensemble-based electrical resistivity tomography to monitor water flow from managed aquifer recharge operations. Journal of Hydrology, 659, 133282.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Dean, T., Tulett, J., and Barnwell, R. [2018] Nodal land seismic acquisition: The next generation. First Break, 36(1), 47–52.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Falabella, F., Pepe, A., Perrone, A., and Stabile, T. A. [2024] A Variance-Covariance method to estimating the errors of 3-D ground displacement time-series using small baseline InSAR algorithms and multi-platform SAR data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 211, 208–227.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Lindsey, N. J., Rademacher, H., and Ajo-Franklin, J. B. [2020] On the broadband instrument response of fiber-optic DAS arrays. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 125, e2019JB018145.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Parolai, S., Mucciarelli, M., Gallipoli, M. R., Richwalski, S. M., and Strollo, A. [2007] Comparison of Empirical and Numerical Site Responses at the Tito Test Site, Southern Italy. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97(5), 1413–1431.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Rizzo, E., Caputo, R., Petronio, L., Giampaolo, V., Capozzoli, L., De Martino, G., Piscitelli, S., Bellanova, J., Rapti, D., Baradello, L., Affatato, A., and Lapenna, V. [2024] Deep geophysical investigations (DERT and Seismic Reflection) to unravel the Ferrara urban area geology. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 15(1), 2423748.
   [Google Scholar]