1887

Abstract

Summary

Fault zones are critical in applications involving subsurface flow, as they can serve as conduits or barriers. Detecting and characterizing faults in the near-surface is challenged by limited surface exposure and sparse borehole data. While electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and seismic refraction tomography (SRT) are commonly employed to investigate fault systems, traditional smooth inversion methods obscure sharp structural features and provide limited uncertainty information. To overcome these limitations, we introduce an ensemble-based inversion workflow that integrates layer-based parameterization with particle-swarm optimization to generate models with sharp interfaces and realistic fault geometries. Results from a synthetic experiment (resembling a normal fault) highlight the high non-uniqueness of the inverse problem, even for a reduced number of model parameters (< 20). Although significant uncertainties are expected, particularly at depth where sensitivity is low, the inversion results can provide insight into an expected fault zone and guide borehole placement.

Because the proposed parameterization is flexible, additional structural information (e.g., fault dip angle and depth to interfaces) can be easily integrated, leading to more realistic models and reduced parameter uncertainty. Our approach opens new avenues for inverting and interpreting fault systems from geophysical data and could be adapted to more complex geological settings.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520163
2025-09-07
2026-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arboleda-Zapata, M., Guillemoteau, J., & Tronicke, J. [2022] A comprehensive workflow to analyze ensembles of globally inverted 2D electrical resistivity models. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 196, 104512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.104512
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. [1995] Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 1942–1948. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Rücker, C., Günther, T., & Wagner, F. M. [2017] pyGIMLi: An open-source library for modelling and inversion in geophysics. Computers and Geosciences, 109, 106–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2017.07.011
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Schütze, C., Vienken, T., Werban, U., Dietrich, P., Finizola, A., & Leven, C. [2012] Joint application of geophysical methods and Direct Push-soil gas surveys for the improved delineation of buried fault zones. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 82, 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.03.002
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Sproule, T. G., Spinelli, G. A., Wilson, J. L., Fort, M. D., Mozley, P. S., & Ciarico, J. [2021] The Effects of Fault-Zone Cementation on Groundwater Flow at the Field Scale. Groundwater, 59(3), 396–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13062
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520163
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520163
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error