1887

Abstract

Summary

This study presents a geophysical investigation of the San Vito Romano landslide, an active, retrogressive movement affecting a village located approximately 57 km from Rome.

The landslide is a rototranslational mechanism involving flysch deposits of the Frosinone Formation (Upper Tortonian). Several preliminary geophysical surveys were conducted, including passive seismic measurements (H/V spectral ratios from ambient noise), Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT), Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW), and Seismic Refraction Tomography (SRT). These techniques provided valuable information on the subsurface structure and mechanical behavior of the landslide body. A seismic monitoring network with four seismometric stations (2.5 Hz eigenfrequency) was deployed to track resonance frequency variations over time and correlate them with rainfall data from a local weather station. Seismic events from the INGV database were selected based on proximity (within 100 km) and magnitude (above M2), and Spectral Standard Ratios (SSR) were calculated to evaluate local seismic amplification. The study also applies the characteristic periods-based (CPB) approach, analyzing Ts/Tm and Tl/Tm ratios to assess potential resonance conditions and estimate maximum seismic displacements. This geophysical approach contributes to understanding slope–seismic wave interactions and improves hazard assessment in landslide-prone areas.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520164
2025-09-07
2026-02-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bourdeau, C., Lenti, L., Martino, S., Oguz, O., Yalcinkaya, E., Bigarrè, P., & Coccia, S. [2017] Comprehensive analysis of the local seismic response in the complex Büyükçekmece landslide area (Turkey) by engineering-geological and numerical modelling. Engineering Geology, 218, 90–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Mainsant, G., Larose, E., Brönnimann, C., Jongmans, D., Michoud, C., & Jaboyedoff, M. [2012] Ambient seismic noise monitoring of a clay landslide: Toward failure prediction. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 117(F1).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Mangifesta, M., Aringoli, D., Pambianchi, G., Giannini, L. M., Scalella, G., & Sciarra, N. [2024] A Methodologic Approach to Study Large and Complex Landslides: An Application in Central Apennines. Geosciences, 14(10), 272.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Martino, S., Lenti, L., Delgado, J., Garrido, J., & Lopez-Casado, C. [2016] Application of a characteristic periods-based (CPB) approach to estimate earthquake-induced displacements of landslides through dynamic numerical modelling. Geophysical Journal International, 206(1), 85–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lenti, L., & Martino, S. [2013] A parametric numerical study of the interaction between seismic waves and landslides for the evaluation of the susceptibility to seismically induced.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Rücker, C., Günther, T., & Wagner, F.M. [2017] pyGIMLi: An open-source library for modelling and inversion in geophysics. Computers and Geosciences, 109, 106–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Wathelet, M., Chatelain, J. L., Cornou, C., Giulio, G. D., Guillier, B., Ohrnberger, M., & Savvaidis, A. [2020] Geopsy: A user‐friendly open‐source tool set for ambient vibration processing. Seismological Research Letters, 91(3), 1878–1889.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Seitone, F., Vergnano, A., Comina, C., Bonasera, M., & Fubelli, G. [2025] Comparative analysis of geological and seismic microtremors models of a large translational landslide: The case of San Vito Romano (Central Italy). Engineering Geology, 347, 107934.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520164
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520164
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error