1887

Abstract

Summary

We show three different ways of imaging small-scale scatterers for an acquisition with a fixed offset on a round grid. We make use of synthetic data by simulating the response of three scatterers, located at a depth of around 20 m. In one case, all scatterers are located at this depth of 20 m and in the other case, they are all located at different depths around this range. The imaging methods tested include diffractor imaging by summing along a diffraction path, imaging with cross-correlations between traces and imaging with windowed cross-correlations between traces. We do this for two linear chirps that have different frequency ranges, one from 2 to 7 kHz and one from 10 to 16 kHz. When the scatterers are not located at the depth of investigation, the cross-correlation methods show a better lateral constraint than the diffractor imaging for both frequency ranges. When the scatterers are located at the investigation depth, the 2–7 kHz range shows the best result for diffractor imaging, however, the 10–16 kHz range shows the best result when windowed cross-correlations are used.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520182
2025-09-07
2026-02-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bowden, D.C., Sager, K., Fichtner, A. and Chmiel, M. [2021] Connecting beamforming and kernel-based noise source inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 224(3), 1607–1620.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Noel, M. and Griffiths, S. [2024] Defining the Buried Boulder Risk for an Offshore Wind Farm with 3D Acoustic Imaging. In: Fifth EAGE Global Energy Transition Conference & Exhibition (GET 2024), 2024. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Robinson, D.J., Snieder, R. and Sambridge, M. [2007] Using coda wave interferometry for estimating the variation in source mechanism between double couple events. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 112(B12).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Römer-Stange, N, Wenau, S., Bihler, V, Keil, H., Ramos Cordova, C.A. and Spiess, V [2022] Boulder Detection in the Shallow Sub-Seafloor by Diffraction Imaging With Beamforming on Ultra-High Resolution Seismic Data—A Feasibility Study. Earth and Space Science, 9(6), e2021EA002156.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. von Rönn, G.A., Schwarzer, K., Reimers, H.C. and Winter, C. [2019] Limitations of boulder detection in shallow water habitats using high-resolution sidescan sonar images. Geosciences, 9(9), 390.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sava, R and Fomel, S. [2006] Time-shift imaging condition in seismic migration. GEOPHYSICS, 71(6), S209–S217.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Shtivelman, V, Keydar, S. and Mikenberg, M. [2009] Imaging near-surface inhomogeneities using weighted multipath summation. Near Surface Geophysics, 7(3), 171–177.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Snieder, R. and Vrijlandt, M. [2005] Constraining the source separation with coda wave interferometry: Theory and application to earthquake doublets in the Hayward fault, California. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 110(B4).
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520182
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520182
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error