1887

Abstract

Summary

We introduce a low-cost, flexible switchbox that automates Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) surveys using a standard 4-electrode resistivity meter. Addressing the prohibitive cost of commercial multi-electrode systems, this solution utilizes affordable Arduino microcontroller technology, relay modules, and open-source software (Python/Arduino).

The switchbox acts as an interface, automatically connecting the meter’s terminals (C1, C2, P1, P2) to the correct field electrodes based on chosen sequences. It supports standard ERT arrays (Wenner, Dipole-Dipole, etc.) and allows users to implement custom configurations, enhancing research flexibility.

Validated in both lab settings (negligible error) and field trials—including archaeological sites in Birmingham (UK) and Negrilesti (Romania), plus urban tree root detection—the system proved reliable. Costing only a couple hundred euros for components, it offers significant advantages: affordability, operational flexibility, portability, and suitability for time-lapse monitoring. This makes advanced ERT techniques accessible for budget-constrained research, education, humanitarian projects, and urban geophysics applications.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520232
2025-09-07
2026-02-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amato, M., Basso, B., Celano, G., Bitella, G., Morelli, G., & Rossi, R. (2008). In situ detection of tree root distribution and biomass by multi-electrode resistivity imaging. Tree Physiol., 29(2–3), 78–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Binley, A., & Kemna, A. (2005). DC resistivity and induced polarization methods. In Hydrogeophysics (pp. 129–156). Springer, Dordrecht.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dahlin, T. (2001). The development of DC resistivity imaging techniques. Computers & Geosciences, 27(9), 1019–1029.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Günther, T., Rücker, C., & Spitzer, K. (2006). Three‐dimensional modelling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography—II: Inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 166(2), 506–517.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Loke, M. H., & Barker, R. D. (1996). Rapid least‐squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi‐Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting, 44(1), 131–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Loke, M. H., Chambers, J. E., Rucker, D. F., Kuras, O., & Wilkinson, P. B. (2013). Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 95, 135–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Mihai, A. E. (2022). The use of geophysical methods in archaeology. Case studies and lessons. University of Bucharest PhD Thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sirota, D. (2020). Development and validation of a low-cost DC resistivity meter for humanitarian geophysics applications. Mines Theses & Dissertations
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Telford, W. M., Geldart, L. P., & Sheriff, R. E. (1990). Applied Geophysics. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Vega, M. dela, Bongiovanni, M. V., Gruhnut, V. (2021). Design of a Low‐Cost Electrical Resistivity Meter for Near Surface Surveys. Earth and Space Science, 8(12)
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wilkinson, P. B., Ogilvy, R. D., Chambers, J. E., Meldrum, P. I. (2007). Array optimisation for multichannel electrical resistivity tomography instruments. Near Surface Geophysics
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520232
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520232
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error