1887

Abstract

Summary

Permafrost warming poses significant environmental and infrastructural challenges, including greenhouse gas release and increased landslide risks necessitating quantitative monitoring. Non-invasive geophysical methods, especially seismic and electrical techniques, are suitable because ice exhibits higher P-wave velocity and electrical resistivity than unfrozen water, making them sensitive to changes in ground ice content. However, single-method approaches can be ambiguous; for example, both ice and air act as electrical insulators.

To address this, a petrophysical joint inversion (PJI) method was developed that estimates volumetric fractions of liquid water, ice, and air from apparent resistivity and seismic traveltime data. A remaining ambiguity is between ice and rock matrix content, as high ice content can mimic low porosity. We extended the PJI along the time axis, assuming constant porosity, and introduced temporal regularization to enforce smooth parameter evolution.

Synthetic experiments demonstrate that the time-lapse PJI improves porosity and ice estimation compared to the traditional PJI, enhancing ground ice quantification from surface geophysical data. Future work includes refining regularization parameters, incorporating advanced petrophysical models, extending to additional geophysical methods, and integrating thermal-hydraulic process models to further enhance the reliability and applicability of geophysical monitoring, contributing to a deeper understanding of permafrost responses to environmental changes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520247
2025-09-07
2026-02-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Biskaborn, B.K., Smith, S.L., Noetzli, J., Matthes, H., Vieira, G., Streletskiy, D.A., Schoeneich, P., Romanovsky, V.E., Lewkowicz, A.G., Abramov, A., Allard, M., Boike, J., Cable, W.L., Christiansen, H.H., Delaloye, R., Diekmann, B., Drozdov, D., Etzelmüller, B., Grosse, G., Guglielmin, M., Ingeman-Nielsen, T., Isaksen, K., Ishikawa, M., Johansson, M., Johannsson, H., Joo, A., Kaverin, D., Kholodov, A., Konstantinov, P., Kröger, T., Lambiel, C., Lanckman, J.P., Luo, D., Malkova, G., Meiklejohn, I., Moskalenko, N., Oliva, M., Phillips, M., Ramos, M., Sannel, A.B.K., Sergeev, D., Seybold, C., Skryabin, P., Vasiliev, A., Wu, Q., Yoshikawa, K., Zheleznyak, M. and Lantuit, H. [2019] Permafrost is warming at a global scale. Nature Communications, 10(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hauck, C., Böttcher, M. and Maurer, H. [2011] A new model for estimating subsurface ice content based on combined electrical and seismic data sets. The Cryosphere, 5(2), 453–468.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Mathys, T., Azimshoev, M., Bektursunov, Z., Hauck, C., Hilbich, C., Duishonakunov, M., Kayumov, A., Kassatkin, N., Kapitsa, V., Martin, L.C.P., Mollaret, C., Navruzshoev, H., Pohl, E., Saks, T., Silmonov, I., Musaev, T., Usubaliev, R. and Hoelzle, M. [2024] Quantifying permafrost ground ice contents in the Tien Shan and Pamir (Central Asia): A Petrophysical Joint Inversion approach using the Geometric Mean model. EGUsphere, 2024, 1–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Mollaret, C., Wagner, F.M., Hilbich, C., Scapozza, C. and Hauck, C. [2020] Petrophysical Joint Inversion Applied to Alpine Permafrost Field Sites to Image Subsurface Ice, Water, Air, and Rock Contents. Frontiers in Earth Science, 8.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Morard, S., Hilbich, C., Mollaret, C., Pellet, C. and Hauck, C. [2024] 20-year permafrost evolution documented through petrophysical joint inversion, thermal and soil moisture data. Environmental Research Letters, 19(7), 074074.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Rücker, C., Günther, T. and Wagner, F. [2017] pyGIMLi: An open-source library for modelling and inversion in geophysics. Computers and Geosciences, 109, 106–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Wagner, F., Mollaret, C., Günther, T., Kemna, A. and Hauck, C. [2019] Quantitative imaging of water, ice, and air in permafrost systems through petrophysical joint inversion of seismic refraction and electrical resistivity data. Geophysical Journal International, 219(3), 1866–1875.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520247
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520247
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error