1887

Abstract

Summary

This study focuses on identifying potential preferential groundwater flow paths beneath Lake Iseo using waterborne geophysical methods and groundwater modeling. The FloaTEM system was used to collect high-resolution subsurface data across 180 km in Lake Iseo and 20 km in nearby wetlands. The collected EM data were processed and inverted using advanced tools (EEMstudio and EEMverter) to produce 3D resistivity models of the southern shore of the Iseo Lake. Bathymetry data were integrated into the inversion process to improve accuracy by breaking constraints at the lake bottom surface. A resistivity threshold was used to identify areas potentially composed of permeable moraine sediments—indicative of preferential flow paths where groundwater exchange is most likely. These geophysical results were then used to inform a MODFLOW 6 groundwater flow model, implemented with Flopy. This model simulates how water might move from the lake to the surrounding aquifers and estimates the travel time of water particles.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520248
2025-09-07
2026-02-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Auken, E., Foged, N., Larsen, J. J., Lassen, K. V. T., Maurya, P. K., Dath, S. M., & Eiskjær, T. T. (2019). tTEM - A towed transient electromagnetic system for detailed 3D imaging of the top 70 m of the subsurface. Geophysics, 84(1), E13–E22. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2018-0355.1
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakker, M., Post, V., Langevin, C. D., Hughes, J. D., White, J. T., Starn, J. J., & Fienen, M. N. (2016). Scripting MODFLOW Model Development Using Python and FloPy. Groundwater, 54(5), 733–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12413
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bini, A., Cita, M. B., & Gaetani, M. (1978). SOUTHERN ALPINE LAKES-HYPOTHESIS OF AN EROSIONAL ORIGIN RELATED TO THE MESSINIAN ENTRENCHMENT*. In Marine Geology (Vol. 27).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Christiansen, A. V., Auken, E., & Sørensen, K. (2006). The transient electromagnetic method. In Groundwater geophysics: A tool for hydrogeology (pp. 179–225). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fiandaca, G., Chen, J., & Zhang, B. (2024). EEMverter, a New Modelling Tool for Electric and Electromagnetic Data with Focus on Induced Polarization. NSG 2024 30th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202420166
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fitterman, D.V, & Deszcz-Pan, M. (1998). Helicopter EM mapping of saltwater intrusion in Everglades National Park, Florida. In Exploration Geophysics (Vol. 29). library.seg.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Harvey, J., & Gooseff, M. (2015). River corridor science: Hydrologic exchange and ecological consequences from bedforms to basins. In Water Resources Research (Vol. 51, Issue 9, pp. 6893–6922). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017617
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hatch, M., Munday, T., & Heinson, G. (2010). A comparative study of in-river geophysical techniques to define variations in riverbed salt load and aid managing river salinization. Geophysics, 75(4). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3475706
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hughes, J. D., Langevin, C. D., Paulinski, S. R., Larsen, J. D., & Brakenhoff, D. (2024). FloPy Workflows for Creating Structured and Unstructured MODFLOW Models. Groundwater, 62(1), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13327
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lane, J. W., Briggs, M. A., Maurya, P. K., White, E. A., Pedersen, J. B., Auken, E., Terry, N., Minsley, B., Kress, W., Le Blanc, D. R., Adams, R., & Johnson, C. D. (2020). Characterizing the diverse hydrogeology underlying rivers and estuaries using new floating transient electromagnetic methodology. Science of the Total Environment, 740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140074
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Langevin, C. D., Hughes, J. D., Banta, E. R., Provost, A. M., Niswonger, R. G., & Panday, S. (2017). MODFLOW 6 Modular Hydrologic Model: U.S. Geological Survey Software.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Manheim, F. T., Krantz, D. E., & Bratton, J. F. (2004). Studying Ground Water Under Delmarva Coastal Bays Using Electrical Resistivity. Groundwater, 42(7), 1052–1068.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Maurya, P. K., Christensen, F. E., Kass, M. A., Pedersen, J. B., Frederiksen, R. R., Foged, N., Christiansen, A. V., & Auken, E. (2022). Technical note: Efficient imaging of hydrological units below lakes and fjords with a floating, transient electromagnetic (FloaTEM) system. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 26(11), 2813–2827. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2813-2022
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Resola, S. (1993). INDAGINI CHIMICO-FISICHE SUI LAGHI DI GARDA, ISEO, IDRO E MORO. Natura Bresciana, 28, 45–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Siemon, B., Christiansen, A. V., & Auken, E. (2009). A review of helicopter-borne electromagnetic methods for groundwater exploration. In Near Surface Geophysics.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sullivan, N. A. L., Viezzoli, A., & Fiandaca, G. (2024). EEMstudio: Process and Model Electric and Electromagnetic Data with a QGIS Plugin. NSG 2024 30th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202420154
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520248
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520248
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error