Machine Learning-Based Inversion of Transient Electromagnetic Data Enhances Interpretation of Groundwater Mapping and Mineral Exploration

References

1. Auken, E., Foged, N., Larsen, J. J., Lassen, K. V. T., Maurya, P. K., Dath, S. M., & Eiskjær, T. T. (2019). tTEM — A towed transient electromagnetic system for detailed 3D imaging of the top 70 m of the subsurface. Geophysics, 84(1), E13–E22. https://doi.org/10.1190/GEO2018-0355.1.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Auken, E., Christiansen, A. V., Jacobsen, L. H., Sørensen, K. I. (2008). A resolution study of buried valleys using laterally constrained inversion of TEM data. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 65(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.03.003.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Asif, M. R., Bording, T. S., Maurya, P. K., Zhang, B., Fiandaca, G., Grombacher, D. J., Christiansen, A. V., Auken, E., & Larsen, J. J. (2022). A neural network-based hybrid framework for least-squares inversion of transient electromagnetic data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 60, 4503610. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3076121.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blatter, D., Key, K., Ray, A., Foley, N., Tulaczyk, S., Auken, E. (2018). Trans-dimensional Bayesian inversion of airborne transient EM data from Taylor Glacier, Antarctica. Geophysical Journal International, 214, 1919–1936. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy255.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Colombo, D., Turkoglu, E., Li, W., Curiel, E. S., & Rovetta, D. (2021). Physics-driven deep-learning inversion with application to transient electromagnetics. Geophysics, 86(3), E209–E224. https://doi.org/10.1190/GEO2020-0760.1.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chandra, S., Tiwari, V. M., Vidyasagar, M., Raju, K. B., Choudhury, J., Lohithkumar, K. et al., (2021). Airborne electromagnetic signatures of an ancient river in the water-stressed Ganga Plain, Prayagraj, India:A potential groundwater Repository. Geophysical Research Letters, 48, e2021GL096100. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL096100.
   [Google Scholar]
7. FiandacaG., Meldgaard MadsenL., MauryaP.K., 2018. Re-parameterisations of the Cole-Cole model for improved spectral inversion of induced polarization data, Near Surface Geophysics, 16 (4), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2017065.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fiandaca, G., Chen, J., Zhang, B., 2024. EEMverter, a New Modelling Tool for Electric and Electromagnetic Data with Focus on Induced Polarization, in: NSG 2024 30th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202420166.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Maurya, P. K., Christensen, F. E., Kass, M. A., Pedersen, J. B., Frederiksen, R. R., Foged, N., Christiansen, A. V., & Auken, E. (2022a). Technical note: Efficient imaging of hydrological units below lakes and fjords with a floating, transient electromagnetic (FloaTEM) system. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 26, 2813–2827. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2813-2022.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Viezzoli, A., & Manca, G., 2019. On airborne IP effects in standard AEM systems: tightening model space with data space. Exploration Geophysics, 50(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/08123985.2019.1681895.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Wu, S. H., Huang, Q., & Zhao, L. (2023). Fast Bayesian inversion of airborne electromagnetic data based on the invertible neural network. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 61, 5907211. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3264777.
    [Google Scholar]