Joint Inversion of Electrical and Electromagnetic Data – Part I: Unprecedented Resolution Improvements

References

1. Albouy, Y., Andrieux, P., Rakotondrasoa, G., Ritz, M., Descloitres, M., Join, J.-L., Rasolomanana, E., 2001. Mapping Coastal Aquifers by Joint Inversion of DC and TEM Soundings-Three Case Histories. Groundwater39, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2001.tb00354.x
   [Google Scholar]
2. Christensen, N.B., 2000. Difficulties in determining electrical anisotropy in subsurface investigations. Geophysical Prospecting. 48(1), 1–19.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Christiansen, A.V., Auken, E., Viezzoli, A., 2011. Quantification of modeling errors in airborne TEM caused by inaccurate system description. GEOPHYSICS76, F43–F52. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3511354
   [Google Scholar]
4. FiandacaG., RammJ., BinleyA., GazotyA., ChristiansenA.V. & AukenE., 2013. Resolving spectral information from time domain induced polarization data through 2-D inversion, Geophysical Journal International, 192, 631–646. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggs060
   [Google Scholar]
5. Fiandaca, G., Chen, J., Zhang, B., 2024. EEMverter, a New Modelling Tool for Electric and Electromagnetic Data with Focus on Induced Polarization, in: NSG 2024 30th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202420166
   [Google Scholar]
6. Lane, R., Green, A., Golding, C., Owers, M., Pik, P., Plunkett, C., Sattel, D., Thorn, B., 2000. An example of 3D conductivity mapping using the TEMPEST airborne electromagnetic system. Exploration Geophysics31, 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1071/EG00162
   [Google Scholar]
7. Madsen, L.M., Fiandaca, G., Auken, E., 2020. 3-D time-domain spectral inversion of resistivity and full-decay induced polarization data—full solution of Poisson's equation and modelling of the current waveform. Geophysical Journal International223, 2101–2116. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa443
   [Google Scholar]
8. Meju, M.A., 2005. Simple relative space–time scaling of electrical and electromagnetic depth sounding arrays: implications for electrical static shift removal and joint DC‐TEM data inversion with the most‐squares criterion. Geophysical Prospecting53, 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00483.x
   [Google Scholar]
9. Vozoff, K., Jupp, D.L.B., 2007. Joint Inversion of Geophysical Data. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society42, 977–991. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1975.tb06462.x
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ward, S.H., Hohmann, G.W., 1988. Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics: Voume 1, Theory. Society of Exploration Geophysicists. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560802631
    [Google Scholar]