1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

Unanticipated saturated response areas (SRAs) at military munitions response sites can have significant cost and schedule impacts on removal actions using advanced geophysical classification (AGC). SRAs are not always addressed in feasibility study (FS) remedial alternative cost estimates, and methods for delineating SRAs are not well defined. This paper will present a recently completed removal action and discuss how methods to address SRAs were modified during the project and streamlined for the next phase of work. This will be contrasted with a recently completed remedial investigation and the methods used to identify and characterize SRAs to inform the FS remedial alternatives for better removal cost estimates.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520289
2025-09-07
2026-01-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2025/nsg2025-5/0289.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520289&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520289
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error