1887

Abstract

Summary

Regional-scale saline aquifers are promising candidates for geological CO storage but present significant modeling challenges due to their vast extent, heterogeneity, and limited subsurface data. This study introduces a multiscale modeling framework that was applied to assess CO storage in the Ponta Aguda saline aquifer (Santos Basin, Brazil, 40,000 km2 area). Consistency of the multiscale models is checked by combining boundaries conditions for pressure match and verification of trapping mechanisms representativity. Four different methods were evaluated regarding the trapping mechanisms accuracy in coarse models: Local Grid Refinement, Effective Values, and Algebraic Dynamic Multilevel. Compositional simulations conducted with CMG-GEM and DARSim2 demonstrate that coarse-scale models systematically overestimate CO trapping due to numerical artifacts, particularly in solubility and hysteresis behavior. These artifacts arise from mismatched CO/brine volumes in large cells, leading to artificially enhanced trapping efficiency. Among the evaluated methods, Algebraic Dynamic Multilevel delivers the most reliable predictions, providing a general solution that aligns closely with fine-scale reference simulations while remaining computationally feasible. The results show the importance of scale-consistent modeling approaches for accurate CO storage assessment and highlight the risks of relying on overly simplified coarse models in the design and optimization of carbon storage projects in large saline aquifers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521052
2025-10-27
2026-01-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. S.Krevor, H. deConinck, S.E.Gasda, N.S.Ghaleigh, V. deGooyert, H.Hajibeygi, R.Juanes, J.Neufeld, J.J.Roberts, F.Swennenhuis. Subsurface carbon dioxide and hydrogen storage for a sustainable energy future. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment4, 102–118 (2023)
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Y.Wang, Z.Zhang, C.Vuik, H.Hajibeygi. Simulation of CO2 Storage Using a Parameterization Method for Essential Trapping Physics: FluidFlower Benchmark Study. Transport in Porous Media, (2023)
    [Google Scholar]
  3. X.Lyu, D.Voskov, Advanced modeling of enhanced CO2 dissolution trapping in saline aquifers. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control127 (2023)
    [Google Scholar]
  4. G.Hampson, A.Martinius, M.Jackson, S.Krevor, J.Storms, D.Voskov, H.Hajibeygi, S.Geiger. Multiscale Stratigraphic Reservoir Characterization for Flow and Storage of CO2: Roadmap for Modelling and Quantitative Understanding. 84th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition (2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. S.Krevor, M. J.Blunt, S. M.Benson, C. H.Pentland, C.Reynolds, A.Al-Menhali, B.Niu, Capillary trapping for geologic carbon dioxide storage – from pore scale physics to field scale implications, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control40 (2015)
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Q.Zhang, S.Geiger, J. E.Storms, D. V.Voskov, M. D.Jackson, G. J.Hampson, C.Jacquemyn, A. W.Martinius, Capillary pinning in sedimentary rocks for CO2 storage: Mechanisms, terminology and state-of-the-art, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control144 (2025)
    [Google Scholar]
  7. G.Pickup, M.Kiatsakulphan, J.Mills, Analysis of grid resolution for simulations of CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers, Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery (ECMOR XII) (2010)
    [Google Scholar]
  8. C.Ukaegbu, O.Gundogan, E.Mackay, G.Pickup, A.Todd, F.Gozalpour, K.Burnard, Simulation of CO2 storage in a heterogeneous aquifer, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy223 (2009)
    [Google Scholar]
  9. C.Doughty, K.Pruess, Modeling supercritical CO2 injection in heterogeneous porous media, Proceedings of the TOUGH Symposium 2003 (2003)
    [Google Scholar]
  10. M. V.Barbosa Machado, M.Delshad, K.Sepehrnoori, A computationally efficient approach to model reactive transport during CO2 storage in naturally fractured saline aquifers, Geoenergy Science and Engineering236 (2024)
    [Google Scholar]
  11. A.Syrakos, G.Efthimiou, J. G.Bartzis, A.Goulas, Numerical experiments on the efficiency of local grid refinement based on truncation error estimates, Journal of Computational Physics231 (2012)
    [Google Scholar]
  12. L. J.Durlofsky, Numerical calculation of equivalent grid block permeability tensors for heterogeneous porous media, Water Resources Research27 (1991)
    [Google Scholar]
  13. M. J.King, M.Mansfield, Flow simulation of geologic models, SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering2 (1999)
    [Google Scholar]
  14. M.Cusini, C.van Kruijsdijk, H.Hajibeygi, Algebraic Dynamic Mutilevel (ADM) method for fully implicit simulations of multiphase flow in porous media, Journal of Computational Physics314 (2016)
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Computer Modelling Group Ltd., Gem compositional & unconventional simulator, 2024. URL: https://www.cmgl.ca/software/gem, version 2024.10, Software for compositional and unconventional reservoir simulation.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. H.Hajibeygi, S.H.Lee, I.Lunati. Accurate and efficient simulation of multiphase flow in a heterogeneous reservoir with error estimate and control in the multiscale finite-volume framework Spe Journal17 (04) (2012).
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521052
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521052
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error