1887

Abstract

Summary

Interference testing is a well-established diagnostic technique for investigating reservoir anisotropy, lateral continuity, flow capacity, heat extraction potential, and boundary conditions in geothermal reservoirs. In a typical interference test, fluid is injected into or produced from a source well, while the pressure response is recorded at an observation well. Given that the pressure disturbance at the observation well is often small – typically less than 1 bar, especially at large inter-well distances – high-resolution pressure gauges are essential. External influences such as barometric pressure variations and earth tides may introduce noise and are accounted for during acquisition or post-processing. The recorded pressure transient reflects the integrated effects of inter-well reservoir properties, and the presence of heterogeneities or flow barriers. Interpretation of this response enables the estimation of areal transmissivity (kh/μ) and storativity (ϕ ct h) between wells as well as the detection of reservoir boundaries. Interference tests provide valuable information for reservoir management decisions.

This paper presents a theoretical overview of interference testing and illustrates its application through a geothermal doublet case. Python programming was employed to generate type curves and support the interpretation of the observed pressure response over time.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521057
2025-10-27
2026-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Deruyck, B. G., Bourdet, D. P., DaPrat, G., and Ramey, H. J. [1982]. Interpretation of Interference Tests in Reservoirs with Double Porosity Behavior—Theory and Field Examples. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. https://doi.org/10.2118/11025-ms
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Earlougher, R. C., and Ramey, H. J. [1973]. Interference analysis in bounded systems. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 12(04). https://doi.org/10.2118/73-04-04
    [Google Scholar]
  3. EipperM. E. [1985]. Computer Generation of Type Curves. M.S. thesis, Stanford Geothermal Programme Report SGP-T R-86. Stanford University.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jacob, C. E. [1941]. Coefficients of storage and transmissibility obtained from pumping tests in the Houston District, Texas. Transactions American Geophysical Union, 22(3), 744–756. https://doi.org/10.1029/tr022i003p00744
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Najurieta, H. L. [1979]. Interference and pulse testing in uniformly fractured reservoirs. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. https://doi.org/10.2118/8283-ms
    [Google Scholar]
  6. PapadopulosI.S. [1965]. Non-steady flow to a well in an infinite anisotropic aquifer. International Symposium of the Assn. Sci. Hydrologic, Dobrovinik, Yugoslavia
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ramey, H. J. [1975]. Interference Analysis for Anisotropic Formations - A Case History (includes associated paper 6406). Journal of Petroleum Technology, 27(10), 1290–1298. https://doi.org/10.2118/5319-pa
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sandal, H. M., Horne, R. N., Ramey, H. J., and Williamson, J. W. [1978]. Interference Testing with Wellbore Storage and Skin Effect at the Produced Well. SPE Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition. https://doi.org/10.2118/7454-ms
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Stallman, R. W. [1952]. Nonequilibrium Type Curves Modified for Two-well Systems. Geological Survey Groundwater Note 3, U.S. Dept. of lnterior, Washington, DC.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Theis, C. V. [1935]. The relation between the lowering of the Piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground‐water storage. Transactions American Geophysical Union, 16(2), 519–524. https://doi.org/10.1029/tr016i002p00519
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Tongpenyai, Y., and Raghavan, R. [1981]. The effect of Wellbore storage and skin on interference test data. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 33(01), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.2118/8863-pa
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521057
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521057
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error