1887

Abstract

Summary

Integrating microbial reactions into fluid flow models is essential for accurately predicting microbial behavior in underground hydrogen storage (UHS) reservoirs. This study demonstrates that simplified mathematical models, which allow for analytical solutions, provide a solid foundation for understanding and improving more complex modeling approaches. The research reveals that microbial consumption of hydrogen is most intense near the wellbore and before the displacement front, increasing with longer injection times. Byproducts of microbial reactions, e.g. hydrogen sulfide, tend to accumulate near this front, offering a practical tool for predicting areas where hazardous substances might accumulate - information vital for production planning and monitoring. The study also finds that environments rich in carbon dioxide accelerate methanogenesis, resulting in greater hydrogen losses and suggesting that carbon dioxide may not be an ideal cushion gas for UHS. While competition among microbial species for hydrogen does not significantly reduce overall consumption in the model, real-world microbial interactions are more complex and influenced by factors like substrate abundance and nutrient availability. The findings emphasize the importance of incorporating site-specific parameters, such as temperature, pH, and water chemistry, into future models, signifying the need for ongoing field sampling and laboratory testing to enhance prediction accuracy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521081
2025-10-27
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dopffel, N., Jansen, S. and Gerritse, J. [2021]. Microbial side effects of underground hydrogen storage – Knowledge gaps, risks and opportunities for successful implementation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy46, 8594–8606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.058
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hagemann, B. [2017]. Numerical and Analytical Modeling of Gas Mixing and Bio-Reactive Transport during Underground Hydrogen Storage. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Lorraine, Clausthal University of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hagemann, B., Hogeweg, S. and Strobel, G [2024]. Application of Analytical Solutions of the Reactive Transport Equation for Underground Methanation Reactors. Transp. Porous Media151, 2601–2623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-024-02129-1
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lindsay, A. D., Gaston, D. R., Permann, C. J., Miller, J. M., Andrš, D., Slaughter, A. E., Kong, F., Hansel, J., Carlsen, R. W., Icenhour, C., Harbour, L., Giudicelli, G. L., Stogner, R. H., German, P., Badger, J., Biswas, S., Chapuis, L., Green, C., Hales, J., … Wong, C. [2022]. 2.0 - MOOSE: Enabling massively parallel multiphysics simulation. SoftwareX, 20, 101202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2022.101202
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Pichler, M. [2019]. Underground sun storage results and outlook. EAGE/DGMK Joint Workshop on Underground Storage of Hydrogen. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201900257
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Šmigáň, P., Greksák, M., Kozánková, J., Buzek, F., Onderka, V. and Wolf, I. [1990]. Methanogenic bacteria as a key factor involved in changes of town gas stored in an underground reservoir. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 73(3), 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1097(90)90733-7
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521081
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521081
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error