1887

Abstract

Summary

The oil and gas industry has over 50 years of experience in continuously developing CO2 transport and injection for advanced oil recovery (EOR). These efforts have highlighted the need for infrastructure adjustments and concerns regarding maintaining the integrity of the well and the entire operation. The technology and requirements for well barrier elements are similar for both permanent CO2 storage and the reuse of O&G production facilities for CO2 injection. This means that specific equipment and infrastructure investments are necessary, including gas treatment facilities, pipelines, compression equipment for transport, distribution lines, and conversion wells for CO2 injection. The focus of this study is on the latter. This study conducts a systematic literature review to identify the key factors in assessing wells for CO2 injection. The outcome is a flowchart for evaluating active and suspended wells. This flowchart encompasses the qualitative and initial analysis of crucial factors in well assessment, such as cement integrity, corrosion, CO2 flow composition, and material compatibility. If the suggested actions cannot rectify the issues with the well, it should be plugged and abandoned. The findings indicate significant potential for the study, including assessing abandoned wells and converting actives and/or suspended wells into monitoring wells.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521086
2025-10-27
2026-01-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bai, M., Zhang, Z., Fu, X. [2016] A review on well integrity issues for CO2 geological storage and enhanced gas recovery. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 59, p. 920–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.043.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barlet-Gouédard, V., Rimmelé, G., Porcherie, O., Quisel, N., Desroches, J. [2009] A solution against well cement degradation under CO2 geological storage environment. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, v. 3,n. 2, p. 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.07.005.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowser, PD., Corey, JD., Darr, CDK, Caro, DA [1989] Innovative Techniques for converting old waterflood injectors to State-of-the-art CO2 injectors. Low permeability reservoirs symposium, 6–8 March, Denver, Colorado Society of Petroleum Engineers. SPE-18976-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brummett, JRWM., Emanuel, AS., Ronquille, JD [1976] Reservoir description by simulation at SACROC – a case history. J. Petrol. Technol. v. 28 (10), p 1241–1255. https://doi.org/10.2118/5536-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Carey, JW., Wigand, M., Chipera, SJ., Woldegabriel, G., Pawar, R., Lichtner, PC., Wehner, SC., Raines, MA., Guthrie, GD [2007] Analysis and performance of oil well cement with 30 years of CO2 exposure from the SACROC Unit, West Texas, USA. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, v. 1 (1), p. 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1750-5836(06)00004-1.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Crow, W., Carey, JW., Gasda, S., Brian Williams, D., Celia, M. [2010] Wellbore integrity analysis of a natural CO2 producer. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, v. 4 (2), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.10.010.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dicharry, RM., Perryman, TL., Ronquille, JD [1973] Evaluation and design of a CO2 miscible flood project- SACROC unit, Kelly-Snyder field. J. Petrol. Technol, v.25 (11), p. 1309–1318. https://doi.org/10.2118/4083-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Doherty, B., Vasylkivska, V., Huerta, N. J., Dilmore, R. [2017] Estimating the Leakage along Wells during Geologic CO2 Storage: Application of the Well Leakage Assessment Tool to a Hypothetical Storage Scenario in Natrona County, Wyoming. Energy Procedia, v. 114, p. 5151–5172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1669.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Duguid, A., Guo, B., Nygaard, R., Ramakrishnan, TS., Chugunov, N. [2021] Monitoring well integrity at the Cranfield field phase III CO2 storage project. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, v. 109 (103341). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103341.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Duguid, A., Scherer, GW [2010] Degradation of oilwell cement due to exposure to carbonated brine. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, v. 4,n. 3, p. 546–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.11.001.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Folger, LK., Guillot, SN [1996] A case study of the development of the sundown slaughter unit CO2 flood Hockley County, Texas. Permian Basin oil and gas recovery conference27–29 March, Midland, Texas. SPE-35189-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gill, TE [1982] Ten Years of Handling CO2 for SACROC Unit. 57th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME. https://doi.org/10.2118/11162-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Han, WS., Mcpherson, BJ., Lichtner, PC., Wang, FP [2010] Evaluation of trapping mechanisms in geologic CO2 sequestration: a case study of SACROC northern platform, a 35-year CO2 injection site. Am. J. Sci., v. 310 (4), p. 282–324. https://doi.org/10.2475/04.2010.03.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hawkes, C., Gardner, C., Watson, T., Chalaturnyk, R. [2011] Overview of wellbore integrity research for the IEA GHG Weyburn-Midale CO2 monitoring and storage project. Energy Procedia, v. 4, p. 5430–5437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.528.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Holm, LW., O’brienLJ [1971] Carbon Dioxide Test at the Mead Strawn Field, J. Petr. Tech., v. 23 (04), p. 431–442. https://doi.org/10.2118/3103-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hosseininoosheri, P., Hosseini, SA., Nuñez-López, V., Lake, LW [2018] Impact of field development strategies on CO2 trapping mechanisms in a CO2–EOR field: A case study in the Permian basin (SACROC unit). Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, v. 72, p. 92–104, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.03.002.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ISO [2017] Carbon dioxide capture, transportation and geological storage – geological storage, ISO 27914:2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Newton, LE. Jr., Mcclay, RA [1977] Corrosion and Operational Problems, CO2 Project, SACROC Unit, SPE Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference. https://doi.org/10.2118/6391-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Nygaard, R. [2010] Well design and well integrity – Wabamun area CO2 sequestration project (WASP). Energy and Environmental Systems Group report, University of Calgary.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Power, MT., Leictht, ML., Barnett, KL [1990] Converting wells in a mature west Texas field for CO2 injection. SPE Drilling Engineering, v. 5(4). SPE-20099-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/20099-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Randhol, P., Cerasi, P. [2009] CO2 Injection Well Integrity. Sintef report. 31.6953.00/01/08.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Raza, A., Gholami, R., Rezaee, R., Bing, C. H., Nagarajan, R., Hamid, MA [2017] Well selection in depleted oil and gas fields for a safe CO2 storage practice: a case study from Malaysia. Petroleum, v. 3 (1), p. 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2016.10.003.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sakamoto, Y., Tanaka, A., Tenma, N., Komai, T. [2013] Numerical Study on Flow Behavior of CO2 around Injected Well for Risk Assessment of Carbon Capture and Storage. Energy Procedia, v. 37, p. 4785–4793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.388.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Schremp, FW., Roberson, GR [1973] Effect of Supercritical CO2 on Materials of Construction. SPE J., v. 15 (03), p. 227–233, 1973. https://doi.org/10.2118/4667-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. SHELL [2014] Well Integrity Assessment Report. Peterhead CCS Project Doc No. PCCS-05-PT-ZW-7180-00004, Revision K02, DECC Ref 11.113.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Smith, L., Billingham, MA., Lee, C-H., Milanovic, D. [2011] Establishing and Maintaining the Integrity of Wells used for Sequestration of CO2. Energy Procedia, v. 4, p. 5154–5161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.492.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. West, JM [1974] Design and Operation of a Supercritical CO2 Pipeline-Compression System, SACROC Unit, Scurry County, Texas, SPE Permian Basin Oil Recovery Conference, Midland, Texas, SPE-4804-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/4804-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521086
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521086
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error