1887

Abstract

Summary

Creating quantitative 3D ground models for offshore wind sites relies on predicting Cone Penetration Test (CPT) and soil parameters from geological, geophysical, and geotechnical data using a combination of computationally intensive machine learning and geostatistical models, and simpler statistical methods. While simple models serve as a fast and interpretable baseline, they may fail to capture lateral soil variability or the non-linear effects of stress. To overcome these limitations, we propose a simplified geostatistical approach for CPT parameter prediction utilising stress-normalised parameters, as successfully applied at the IJmuiden Ver Gamma Wind Farm site. The primary benefits of the model are speed, stability, and interpretability, allowing for rapid model updates and validation of the interpreted geological structure itself. Within the broader ground modelling workflow, this approach acts as a powerful complementary tool, generating a robust, low-frequency background model, while machine learning techniques capture more subtle details and complex relationships between geophysical and geotechnical data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521129
2025-10-27
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. DNVGL (2021). Statistical representation of soil data. Document No. DNV-RP-C207
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Forsberg, C. F., Lunne, T., Vanneste, M., James, L., Tjelta, T. I., Barwise, A., & Duffy, C. (2017, January). Synthetic CPTs from intelligent ground models based on the integration of geology, geotechnics and geophysics as a tool for conceptual foundation design and soil investigation planning. In Offshore Site Investigation Geotechnics 8th International Conference Proceeding (Vol. 1254, No. 1259, pp. 1254–1259). Society for Underwater Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. GriffithsL., KlinkvortR.T., SauvinG., VannesteM., BeyerS., DujardinJ., Vardy, M.E. Vardy (2024). Predicting Cone Penetration Tests from Seismo-Acoustic Data: Reliable Uncertainty Quantification Using Conformal Prediction. In Fifth EAGE Global Energy Transition Conference & Exhibition (GET 2024) (Vol. 2024, No. 1, pp. 1–5). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Klinkvort, R.T., Sauvin, G., Forsberg, C.F., Vanneste, M., (2020). Integrated Ground Modelling from a Geotechnical Perspective. Conference: 4th International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics at: Austin, Texas, USA
    [Google Scholar]
  5. NGI (2022). Ten noorden van de Waddeneilanden Wind Farm Zone Integrated Ground Model. Doc No. 20190798-04-R. Client RVO.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. NGI (2025). Integrated Ground Model Report - Ground Model for the Ijmuiden Ver Gamma Wind Farm Site, Document No.: 20220204-05-R – Revision No. 1 (April, 2025). Client RVO.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Solid Ground (2023). Energinet Energy Island North Sea. Client Energinet.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Vardy, M.E., Vanneste, M., Henstock, T.J., Clare, M.A., Forsberg, C. and Provenzano, G. (2017). State-of-the-art remote characterization of shallow marine sediments: the road to a fully integrated solution. Near Surface Geophysics, 15, 387–402.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Vardy, M. E., Clare, M. A., Vanneste, M., Forsberg, C. F., and Dix, J. K. (2018). Seismic Inversion for Site Characterization: When, Where and Why Should We Use It?Offshore Technology Conference, Volume 2018: Houston, TX, OTC, p. 8.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521129
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521129
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error