1887

Abstract

Summary

This study investigates the interaction of hydrogen with shale caprock in the presence of various brines under different reservoir conditions, emphasizing contact angle as an indicator of wettability. Two types of brine were utilized: one simulating high-salinity conditions closer to Middle Eastern fields, and the other with reduced salinity, approximating the Lehen reservoir in Austria, a location previously evaluated for hydrogen storage. Contact angle measurements were conducted using a high-pressure, high-temperature goniometer and the captive bubble method to analyze hydrogen’s behavior at the rock-brine interface.

The findings indicate that elevated pressure amplifies the water-wet characteristics of the caprock, particularly in the low-salinity brine from Lehen, which consistently yielded greater contact angles. This indicates that hydrogen is less prone to dispersal on the rock surface in such settings, promoting enhanced brine adhesion—an essential characteristic for reliable subsurface hydrogen storage. Conversely, temperature exerted a negligible influence on wettability. The research emphasizes that the ionic composition of the brine, especially the prevalence of sodium or potassium ions, influences changes in wettability.

The findings points out the significance of brine chemistry and reservoir pressure in maintaining caprock integrity, crucial for the secure and enduring storage of hydrogen in geological formations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521149
2025-10-27
2026-01-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. J.Mouli-Castillo, N.Heinemann, and K.Edlmann, “Mapping geological hydrogen storage capacity and regional heating demands: An applied UK case study,” Appl. Energy, vol. 283, no. August 2020, p. 116348, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116348.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116348 [Google Scholar]
  2. H.Aghaei, A.Al-Yaseri, A.Toorajipour, B.Shahsavani, N.Yekeen, and K.Edlmann, “Host-rock and caprock wettability during hydrogen drainage: Implications of hydrogen subsurface storage,” Fuel, vol. 351, p. 129048, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129048.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129048 [Google Scholar]
  3. A. S.Mathew, S.Mondal, S. D.Kulkarni, and V. C.Nair, “Underground hydrogen storage case studies: current status, ongoing activities, and global potential,” in Subsurface Hydrogen Energy Storage, Elsevier, 2025, pp. 359–386. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑443‑24071‑3.00014‑5.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-24071-3.00014-5 [Google Scholar]
  4. K. W. G.P and R. P.G, “An overview of underground hydrogen storage with prospects and challenges for the Australian context,” Geoenergy Sci. Eng., vol. 231, no. April, p. 212354, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212354.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212354 [Google Scholar]
  5. F.Hidayat and T. M. S.Astsauri, “Applied random forest for parameter sensitivity of low salinity water Injection (LSWI) implementation on carbonate reservoir,” Alexandria Eng. J., vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 2408–2417, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.096.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.096 [Google Scholar]
  6. N.Hassannayebi, S.Azizmohammadi, M.De Lucia, and H.Ott, “Underground hydrogen storage: application of geochemical modelling in a case study in the Molasse Basin, Upper Austria,” Environ. Earth Sci., vol. 78, no. 5, p. 177, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12665‑019‑8184‑5.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8184-5 [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521149
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521149
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error