1887

Abstract

Summary

This study gives a brief overview of the potential for geologic/natural hydrogen in Norway. There are several ophiolite complexes and other rock types that are exposed in Norway as a result of tectonic activities. Examples of these exposed at surface are the Leka ophiolite, the Bymarka ophiolite, etc. These rocks are rich in iron and have the potential for generating hydrogen.

Norway may have good potential for geologic hydrogen based on initial analyses of source rock exposed in various geological provinces. Presence of ophiolites and different types of ultramafic rocks can form source rocks for hydrogen generation in the subsurface. Additionally, there are deep-seated fault systems in onshore and offshore Norway that are considered favourable for transportation of generated hydrogen from deep subsurface to potential shallow reservoirs. Possible hydrogen production may have been accumulated in reserves that need investigation to be located/explored. Furthermore, these rocks have a good potential to be stimulated to produce hydrogen. For the latter case, studies should be focused on the present-day geologic setting, and thermo-hydro-mechanical conditions of the feasible source rocks.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521157
2025-10-27
2026-01-13

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521157
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Becker, N. A., Nelson, W. R., Browning‐ Hanson, J. F., George, F. R., Crowley, J. L., & Viete, D. R. [2024]. Forearc variability and the geochemical diversity of suprasubduction zone ophiolites: Insights from the Leka ophiolite complex, Norway. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 25, e2023GC011412. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GC011412.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Brunel [2025]. https://www.brunel.net/en/blog/renewable-energy/3-main-types-of-hydrogen.
  3. EllisG.S. and GelmanS.E. [2024]. Model predictions of global geologic hydrogen resources. Sci. Adv. 10, eado0955 (2024).
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Hasiuk, F. and Conley, D.M. [2025]. Exploring geologic hydrogen: a new frontier for affordable, reliable energy security. Sandia National Laboratories.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Hartmann, J. and Moosdorf, N. [2012]. Global Lithological Map Database v1.0 (gridded to 0.5° spatial resolution) [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.788537, Supplement to:
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Hartmann, J; Moosdorf, N (2012): The new global lithological map database GLiM: A representation of rock properties at the Earth surface. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 13, Q12004, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GC004370.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Mayhew, L.E., Ellison, E.T. [2020]. A synthesis and meta-analysis of the Fe chemistry of serpentinites and serpentine minerals. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Feb 21;378(2165): 20180420. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2018.0420. E pub 2020 Jan 6. PMID: 31902340; PMCID: PMC7015306.
     https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0420 [Google Scholar]
  8. Michels, A.C., McEnroe, S.A. and Fichler, C. [2018]. Geophysical expression of the Leka Ophiolite, Norway, modeled from integrated gravity, magnetic and petrophysical data. Norwegian Journal of Geology98, 103–125. https://dx.doi.org/10.17850/njg98-1-07.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Slagstad, T. [2003]. Geochemistry of trondhjemites and mafic rocks in the Bymarka ophiolite fragment, Trondheim, Norway:petrogenesis and tectonic implications. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, 83, 167–185.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Slagstad, T., Pin, C., Roberts, D., Kirkland, C.L., Grenne, T., Dunning, G., Sauer, S. and Andersen, T. [2014]. Tectonomagmatic evolution of the Early Ordovician suprasubduction-zone ophiolites of the Trondheim Region, Mid-Norwegian Caledonides. Geological Society of London Special Publications 390, 541–561. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP390.11.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Slagstad, T., Davidsen, B. and Daly, J. S. [2011]. Age and composition of crystalline basement rocks on the Norwegian continental margin: offshore extension and continuity of the Caledonian–Appalachian orogenic belt. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 168, 1167–1185.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Zgonnik, V. [2020]. The occurrence and geoscience of natural hydrogen: a comprehensive review. Earth Sci Rev 2020; 203:103140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521157
Loading
Geologic/Natural Hydrogen Potential in Norway
Conference Proceedings 2025, 1 (2025); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202521157
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521157
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521157
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error