1887

Abstract

Summary

This study investigates the relationship between deep geothermal fluid injection and induced seismicity, focusing on the 2019–2020 seismic events near Strasbourg, France, as part of the Geoven project. A numerical model based on the diffusion equation was developed to simulate pressure perturbations, aiming to assess seismic risk and characterize reservoir behavior. Key processes such as fault geometry, regional tectonic stresses, and pore pressure variations were analyzed.

The research employs a stepwise methodology to evaluate fault reactivation potential and pressure diffusion in response to injection activities. Real injection and pressure data over a period were used to calibrate and validate the model. Both homogeneous and heterogeneous permeability scenarios were tested, showing that geological features like permeability barriers significantly influence pressure distribution. The inclusion of seismic events and post-seismic creep further improved model accuracy. This study emphasizes the significant role of subsurface pressure changes in initiating remote seismic events and the necessity of precise geo-reservoir characterization and geomechanical modeling to ensure safe and sustainable geothermal development. Through the integration of injection records, pressure data, and fault behavior analysis, it offers valuable understanding of the processes behind induced seismicity, contributing to more effective risk management in geothermal energy development.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521178
2025-10-27
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bachmann, C.E., Wiemer, S., Woessner, J. and Hainzl, S.2011. Statistical analysis of the induced Basel 2006 earthquake sequence: probability-based monitoring for EGS. Geophysical Journal International, 186, 793–807.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cappa, F. and Rutqvist, J.2011. Modeling of coupled hydro-mechanical processes during a hydraulic stimulation experiment. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 48, 532–548.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ellsworth, W.L.2013. Injection-induced earthquakes. Science, 341, 1225942.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Heidbach, O., Rajabi, M., Reiter, K. and Ziegler, M.2016. The World Stress Map database release 2016: crustal stress pattern across scales. GFZ Data Services. https://doi.org/10.5880/WSM.2016.002
    [Google Scholar]
  5. McClure, M. and Horne, R.N.2013. Investigation of injection-induced seismicity using a coupled fluid flow and rate/state friction model. Geothermics, 49, 66–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Segall, P.2010. Earthquake and Volcano Deformation. Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Shapiro, S.A., Dinske, C. and Kummerow, J.2003. Probability of induced seismicity due to fluid injections. Geophysics, 68, 441–448.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tester, J.W., Anderson, B.J., Batchelor, A.S., Blackwell, D.D., DiPippo, R. et al., 2006. The Future of Geothermal Energy: Impact of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st Century. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521178
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521178
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error