1887

Abstract

Summary

This study investigates how risks related to Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) are understood and perceived across five European countries: Norway, the Netherlands, Germany, Romania, and Greece. As part of the RamonCo project, we apply a transdisciplinary framework to assess risks not only from a technical standpoint but also through societal, political, and economic lenses. Drawing on both stakeholder focus groups and representative public surveys, we examine how perceived and systemic risks interact, using the societal embeddedness level methodology as our guiding framework. Our findings highlight a range of interdependent risks across all CCS stages (capture, transport, storage, and monitoring) with recurring concerns including regulatory uncertainty, financial risk, public acceptance, and long-term liability. Many of these risks are shaped by context-specific factors and stakeholder perspectives, underlining the need for adaptive, participatory risk assessment approaches. By capturing both technical and socially constructed risks, this research lays the foundation for the development of inclusive risk governance strategies that can support more effective and publicly acceptable CCS deployment. In the next phase of the project we will apply adapted bow-tie analysis to collaboratively map risk pathways and identify targeted mitigation strategies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521179
2025-10-27
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Kapetaki, Z., Hetland, J., Le Guenan, T., Mikunda, T., Scowcroft, J. [2017]. Highlights and Lessons from the EU CCS Demonstration Project Network. In: Energy Procedia, 114, 5562–5569.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Otto, D., Gross, M., [2021]. Stuck on Coal and Persuasion? A Critical Review of Carbon Capture and Storage Communication. In: Energy Research & Social Science, 82, 102306.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Renn, O. [2008]. Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Slovic, P. [1987]. Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280–285.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Sprenkeling, M., Geerdink, T., Slob, A. and Geurts, A., [2022]. Bridging social and technical sciences: introduction of the Societal Embeddedness Level. Energies, vol. 15, no. 17, p. 6252, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Terwel, B. W., Harinck, F., Ellemers, N., Daamen, D. D. [2012]. Going beyond the properties of CO2 storage: The role of trust in intentions and perceived justice in public acceptance of CCS. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 11, 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Upham, P. and Roberts, T. [2011]. Public perceptions of CCS: Emergent themes in pan-European focus groups and implications for communications. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 5(5), 1359–1367.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Van Asselt, M. B. A., and Renn, O. [2011]. Risk governance. Journal of Risk Research, 14(4), 431–449.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521179
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521179
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error