1887

Abstract

Summary

Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage (ATES) and open-loop unidirectional Groundwater Heating and Cooling (GWHC) systems can supply sustainable, low carbon heating and cooling. The technologies use similar numbers of borehole pairs and have similar installation and operational costs. However, the seasonal reversal of ATES systems allows for the capture and re-use of energy that is wasted in GWHC systems.

Here we establish a framework to simulate the impact of a wide range subsurface and design parameters on both ATES and GWHC system performance. We assume homogeneous aquifer properties and no groundwater flow, to establish a baseline for future investigation. Aquifer permeability anisotropy is considered as an uncertain aquifer property. The lateral spacing of boreholes, borehole screen length and vertical offsetting of screens are considered as key design decisions.

Results indicate that ATES systems in the absence of groundwater flow always produce more energy than equivalent GWHC systems. They also offer higher energy density, which is important in urban settings with high demand per unit area. The optimal combination of high energy and high energy density is obtained from ATES systems with long screen length and close borehole spacing that is slightly less than twice the thermal radius.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521180
2025-10-27
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BayerP., AttardG., BlumP. and MenbergK. [2019] The geothermal potential of cities. Renew Sustain Energy Reviews106, 17–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BloemendalM, Jaxa-RozenM and OlsthoornT. [2018a] Methods for planning of ATES systems. Applied Energy216, 534–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BloemendalM. and HartogN.: Analysis of the impact of storage conditions on the thermal recovery efficiency of low-temperature ATES systems. Geothermics [2018b] 71, 306–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. DoughtyC., HellströmG., TsangC.F. and ClaessonJ.: A dimensionless parameter approach to the thermal behavior of an aquifer thermal energy storage system [1982] Water Resour Res18, 571–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jackson, M.D., Regnier, G. & Staffell, I. [2024] Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage for low carbon heating and cooling in the United Kingdom: Current status and future prospects, Appl.Energy376, 124096.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. RegnierG., SalinasP., JacquemynC. and JacksonM.D. [2022] Numerical simulation of aquifer thermal energy storage using surface-based geologic modelling and dynamic mesh optimisation. Hydrogeology Journal30, 1179–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Salinas, P., Regnier, G., Jacquemyn, C., PainC.C. and Jackson, M.D. [2021] Dynamic mesh optimisation for geothermal reservoir modelling, Geothermics94, 10289.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521180
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521180
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error