1887

Abstract

Summary

This study investigates the interactions between Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage (ATES) systems and groundwater extraction within protected drinking water zones, focusing on the effects of seasonal thermal imbalance. ATES systems store and recover thermal energy using aquifers, offering a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels for heating and cooling. However, their deployment is restricted in groundwater protection areas due to concerns about thermal and chemical interference with drinking water supplies.

Using a synthetic groundwater model based on the Grobbendonk extraction zone in Belgium, the study simulates 800 scenarios with varying degrees of seasonal imbalance—where summer heat injection exceeds winter extraction. The results show that such an imbalance increases annual temperature fluctuations at nearby groundwater wells from 1.2°C to 1.5°C. Sensitivity analysis identifies the imbalance and flow rates as the most influential factors, with geological conditions also playing a significant role.

The findings suggest that thermal disturbances increase under imbalance but stabilize over time without long-term cumulative effects. This research provides quantitative insights into safe ATES deployment near groundwater wells, supporting more flexible regulations and improved subsurface planning for sustainable energy use.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521206
2025-10-27
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Fetting, C. (2020). The European green deal. ESDN Report, December, 2(9), 53.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Deleersnyder, W., Tas, L., Szwoch, D., & Hermans, T. (2024, November). Exploring Interactions between Groundwater Extraction and Shallow Geothermal Energy to Use the Subsurface Optimally and Sustainably. In Fifth EAGE Global Energy Transition Conference & Exhibition (GET 2024). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Langevin, C.D., Provost, A.M., Panday, Sorab, and Hughes, J.D., 2022, Documentation for the MODFLOW 6 Groundwater Transport Model: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 6, chap. A61, 56 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Casillas-Trasvina, A., Rogiers, B., Beerten, K., Wouters, L., & Walraevens, K. (2024). Bayesian inference of coupled groundwater flow and radiogenic helium-4 production and transport at the catchment scale. Science of The Total Environment, 954, 176510.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Park, J., Yang, G., Satija, A., Scheidt, C., & Caers, J. (2016). DGSA: A Matlab toolbox for distance-based generalized sensitivity analysis of geoscientific computer experiments. Computers & Geosciences, 97, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.08.021
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521206
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521206
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error