1887

Abstract

Summary

Geological carbon sequestration (GCS) has been identified as a key technology for mitigating greenhouse gases (GHGs) from emissions-intensive sectors such as: cement, steel, petroleum, refining and chemicals. However, the successful deployment of large-scale projects, hinge on its ability to safely monitor and verify the migration and containment of the injected carbon dioxide (CO2). Among the monitoring methods, seismic techniques that rely on wave propagation analysis are particularly valuable because they track real-time changes in the subsurface during carbon dioxide storage. They are effective in detecting fault slip, and microseismical events; factors that previous studies such as ( ), have identified as key geomechanical risks in geological carbon storage (GCS).

Several numerical approaches have been widely developed to analyse and mitigate these geomechanical risks associated with carbon dioxide (CO2) storage. Although these models have advanced considerably, a key challenge remains in connecting hydromechanical processes such as pressure buildup, and fault reactivation, to fully dynamic three-dimensional poroelastic wave propagation and the resulting ground motions in anisotropic media. This existing challenge poses difficulties for reliable risk assessment since ground motion parameters like peak ground velocity (PGV) and seismic intensity are relevant in the safe design of GCS repositories.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521293
2025-10-27
2026-01-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Biot, M. A. (1941). General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. Journal of Applied Physics, 12(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1712886
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Biot, M. A. (1956). Theory of Propagation of Elastic Waves in a Fluid-Saturated Porous Solid. II. Higher Frequency Range. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 28(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908241
    [Google Scholar]
  3. De Marchi, N., Xotta, G., Ferronato, M., & Salomoni, V. (2024). An efficient multi-field dynamic model for 3D wave propagation in saturated anisotropic porous media. Journal of Computational Physics, 510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2024.113082
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kanamori, H., & Anderson, D. L. (1975). THEORETICAL BASIS OF SOME EMPIRICAL RELATIONS IN SEISMOLOGY. In Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (Vol. 65,Issue5).http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/bssa/articlepdf/65/5/1073/5320189/bssa0650051073.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Rutqvist, J. (2012). The geomechanics of CO 2 storage in deep sedimentary formations. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 30(3), 525–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9491.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521293
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202521293
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error