1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

An optimized monitoring system for geological CO storage must be built on knowledge from multiple disciplines and the involvement of multiple stakeholders. In this work we demonstrate a transdisciplinary approach to secure the technical, operational, economic, and societal embeddedness of the solutions for monitoring geological storage of CO. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) framework was chosen since it enables group discussions for selecting the relevant criteria, it enables assessment of the monitoring solutions by multiple experts, and not least is a transparent and structured framework for decision making. A synthetic brine-filled storage site representative of the Norwegian Continental Shelf was defined as a test site for the study, and a set of three realistic monitoring alternatives was defined by experts, considering the risks and features of the site. The study was also informed by the Societal Embeddedness Level (SEL) which is a novel methodology designed to assess the societal requirements necessary for the successful deployment of technological innovations, particularly those impacting the environment.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522023
2025-09-01
2026-02-06

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522023
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2025/wccus/23.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522023&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. J.Hokkanen and P.Salminen, “ELECTRE III and IV Decision Aids in an Environmental Problem,” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 215–226, 1997, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099‑1360(199707)6:4<215::AID‑MCDA139>3.0.CO;2‑P.
     https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199707)6:4<215::AID-MCDA139>3.0.CO;2-P [Google Scholar]
  2. J. P.Brans, Ph.Vincke, and B.Mareschal, “How to select and how to rank projects: The Promethee method,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 228–238, Feb. 1986, doi: 10.1016/0377‑2217(86)90044‑5.
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5 [Google Scholar]
  3. W.Edwards and F. H.Barron, “SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 306–325, Dec. 1994, doi: 10.1006/obhd.1994.1087.
     https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1087 [Google Scholar]
  4. T. L.Saaty, “How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 9–26, Sep. 1990, doi: 10.1016/0377‑2217(90)90057‑I.
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I [Google Scholar]
  5. O. S.Vaidya and S.Kumar, “Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 1–29, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028.
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028 [Google Scholar]
  6. K.Midttømme, M.Lien, H.Puts, and A.Stork, “Digital Monitoring of Co2 Storage Projects (Digimon),” SSRN Journal, 2021, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.38231.3.
     https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.38231.3 [Google Scholar]
  7. M.Sprenkeling, T.Geerdink, A.Slob, and A.Geurts, “Bridging Social and Technical Sciences: Introduction of the Societal Embeddedness Level,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 17, p. 6252, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15176252.
     https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176252 [Google Scholar]
  8. D.Otto et al., “On the Organisation of Translation—An Inter- and Transdisciplinary Approach to Developing Design Options for CO2 Storage Monitoring Systems,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 15, Art. no. 15, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15155678.
     https://doi.org/10.3390/en15155678 [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522023
Loading
A Framework for Holistic, Transdisciplinary, Multi-Criteria Optimization of the Monitoring System for Geological CO2 Storage
Conference Proceedings 2025, 1 (2025); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202522023
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522023
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522023
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error