1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

The current development of multiple Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) projects in the UK Continental Shelf, and in the Norwegian, Dutch and Danish North Sea, will be vital components of a secure, low carbon energy future for the region. The injection of many millions of tonnes of CO2 should also be accompanied by the implementation of a robust seismic monitoring system near large-scale injection facilities, due to the associated increase of the risk of inducing large seismic events during the injection. The lack of seismic monitoring near large-scale injection facilities in offshore environments is understandably due to the challenges of seismic monitoring in such settings. However, the implementation of DAS technology could provide a cost-effective solution that can complement conventional methods to improve the robustness of seismic monitoring systems offshore. In this study, we aim to evaluate the detection and location performance of offshore DAS arrays by compiling multiple datasets (including areas within CCS licensees in the North Sea). We first examine for each DAS dataset the detectability of local and regional earthquakes. We then locate the detected events to quantify the location uncertainties associated with the geometry of offshore DAS arrays.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522038
2025-09-01
2026-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2025/wccus/38.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522038&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Igel, J. K., Klaasen, S., Noe, S., Nomikou, P., Karantzalos, K., & Fichtner, A. (2024). Challenges in Submarine Fiber-Optic Earthquake Monitoring. JGR Solid Earth, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JB029556.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Juanes, R., Castiñeira, D., Fehler, M. C., Hager, B. H., Jha, B., Shaw, J. H., & Plesch, A. (2017). Coupled Flow and Geomechanical Modeling, and Assessment of Induced Seismicity, at the Castor Underground Gas Storage Project. Final Report.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Spica, Z. J., Ajo‐Franklin, J., Beroza, G. C., Biondi, B., Cheng, F., Gaite, B., … Zhu, T. (2023). PubDAS: A PUBlic Distributed Acoustic Sensing Datasets Repository for Geosciences. Seismological Research Letters, 94(2A), 983–998. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220220279.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Viens, L., Bonilla, L. F., Spica, Z. J., Nishida, K., Yamada, T., & Shinohara, M. (2022). Nonlinear Earthquake Response of Marine Sediments With Distributed Acoustic Sensing. Geophysical Research Letters, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100122.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Wuestefeld, A., Spica, Z. J., Aderhold, K., Huang, H.-H., Ma, K.-F., Lai, V. H., … Di. (2023). The Global DAS Month of February 2023. Seismological Research Letters, 95(3), 1569–1577. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230180.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Yin, J., Soto, M. A., Ramírez, J., Kamalov, V., Zhu, W., Husker, A., & Zhan, Z. (2023). Real-Data Testing of Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Offshore Earthquake Early Warning. The Seismic Record, 3(4), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1785/0320230018.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522038
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522038
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error