1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

Efficient CO storage monitoring is crucial for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) projects. At the Sleipner field, CO has been injected into the Miocene Utsira Formation since 1996, and seven seismic surveys have been acquired between 1994 and 2010 to monitor the movement of CO2. Due to acquisition and processing inconsistencies, traditional analysis methods face challenges in computing quantitative differences within series of time-lapse seismic surveys, affecting the quality of the results. This study introduces a novel quantitative method leveraging Relative Geological Time (RGT) models for accurate 4D time-shift estimation.

By systematically interpreting stratigraphic layers and calibrating RGT models, the proposed method achieves precise volumetric estimates of time-shifts in reservoirs within two seismic volumes. The approach reduces noise sensitivity and computational demands by focusing on cross-correlations between models rather than direct seismic trace correlations.

Applied to the seven Sleipner seismic surveys (1994–2010), the results reveal detailed analysis of the different steps of the plume migration. Results show improved detection of subtle reservoir changes, highlighting intra-impermeable barriers controlling the CO distribution.

This method enhances 4D seismic analysis by providing detailed time-shift estimations that are immune to local noise. As a result, it improves CO migration tracking and storage integrity assessment.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522040
2025-09-01
2026-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2025/wccus/40.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522040&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bergmann, P., & Chadwick, A. [2015]. Volumetric bounds on subsurface fluid substitution using 4D seismic time shifts with an application at Sleipner, North Sea. Geophysics, 80(5), B153–B165.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Boait, F. C., White, N. J., Bickle, M. J., Chadwick, R. A., Neufeld, J. A., & Huppert, H. E. [2012]. Spatial and temporal evolution of injected CO2 at the Sleipner Field, North Sea. Journal of geophysical research: solid earth, 117(B3).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chadwick, A., Williams, G., Delepine, N., Clochard, V., Labat, K., Sturton, S., BuddensiekM.L., DillenM., NickelM., LimaA.L., ArtsR., NeeleF., & Rossi, G. [2010]. Quantitative analysis of time-lapse seismic monitoring data at the Sleipner CO 2 storage operation. The Leading Edge, 29(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cho, Y., & Jun, H. [2021]. Estimation and uncertainty analysis of the CO2 storage volume in the Sleipner field via 4D reversible-jump Markov-chain Monte Carlo. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 200, 108333.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hale, D. [2006]. Fast local cross-correlations of images. In SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting (pp. SEG-2006). SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hale, D. [2013]. Dynamic warping of seismic images. Geophysics, 78(2), S105–S115.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hatchell, P. J., Kawar, R. S., & Savitski, A. A. [2005]. Integrating 4D seismic, geomechanics and reservoir simulation in the Valhall oil field. In 67th EAGE Conference & Exhibition (pp. cp-1). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Pauget, F., Lacaze, S., & Valding, T. [2009]. A global approach in seismic interpretation based on cost function minimization. In SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting (pp. SEG-2009). SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Rickett, J. E., & Lumley, D. E. [2001]. Cross-equalization data processing for time-lapse seismic reservoir monitoring: A case study from the Gulf of Mexico. Geophysics, 66(4), 1015–1025.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522040
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522040
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error