1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

For pressurized gasification, precombustion CO capture requires less energy and smaller equipment than does amine-based postcombustion CO capture. However, equipment and processes that have been designed and validated on coal-fired gasification may not operate as expected when converting to biomass-fired gasification. Pilot-scale tests on cofiring biomass with various ranks of coal showed that behavior was nonlinear, meaning that performance when firing 100% biomass cannot be predicted by extrapolating from trends with increasing blend ratios of biomass in coal. Operating at lower pressures with tar cracking helped with stable feeding and operation when gasifying 100% biomass but also reduced CO capture and thermal efficiencies. Measurements of major tar compounds in the syngas, CO capture solvent, and product gas streams revealed that gasification with different feedstocks and at different conditions leads to changes in how tar accumulates and then partitions to various downstream processes. Results from the pilot-scale testing were used to construct accurate Aspen models that could be scaled for economic and lifecycle analysis under various operating assumptions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522053
2025-09-01
2026-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2025/wccus/53.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522053&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. National Energy Technology Laboratory Office of Program Planning and Analysis. [2019]. Quality Guidelines for Energy System Studies: Cost Estimation Methodology for NETL Assessments of Power Plant Performance. NETL-PUB-22580.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Stanislowski, J., Tolbert, S., Beddoe, C., Musich, M., Henderson, A. and Carriere, N. [2021]. Biomass cofiring with precombustion carbon capture baseline testing at UND EERC. Final Report for Leidos IDQ Subcontract P010227025, EERC Publication 2021-EERC-12-07.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522053
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522053
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error