1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

This research introduces a novel Dynamic-Common Risk Segment (D-CRS) mapping methodology, a significant advancement for rapid CO storage site screening. Unlike static CRS mapping, D-CRS integrates dynamic plume behavior and pressure dissipation, enhancing storage security assessments. The method incorporates refined parameter estimations-injection rate, plume size, and time to hazards-with geomechanical constraints, aligning with EPA standards, to determine storage capacity.

Key innovations include a modified plume size prediction, accounting for gravity-driven injection rate variations, and a novel injection rate estimation considering near-wellbore heterogeneity. The D-CRS framework synthesizes these dynamics into color-coded maps, enabling rapid identification of promising sites within a targeted area of the complex Malay Basin, a real-world dataset with diverse hazards.

Leveraging authentic field data and sophisticated analytical techniques, this D-CRS methodology provides a realistic, efficient screening tool, empowering informed CCS deployment. This study further refines the understanding of pressure propagation and plume dynamics, offering a more refined approach to risk assessment. It establishes a robust foundation for future validation across diverse subsurface environments.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522074
2025-09-01
2026-02-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2025/wccus/74.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522074&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bresenham, J. E.1998. Algorithm for computer control of a digital plotter. Seminal graphics: pioneering efforts that shaped the field.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bump, A. P., Hovorka, S. D. & Meckel, T. A.2021. Common risk segment mapping: Streamlining exploration for carbon storage sites, with application to coastal Texas and Louisiana. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 111, 103457.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. EPA, U. S.2018. Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program Class VI Implementation Manual for UIC Program Directors [Online]. U.S. Environmental Pretection Agency. Available: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2018-01/documents/implementation_manual_508_010318.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Muggeridge, A., Abacioglu, Y., England, W. & Smalley, C.2004. Dissipation of anomalous pressures in the subsurface. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 109.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Nordbotten, J. M., Celia, M. A. & Bachu, S.2005. Injection and storage of CO2 in deep saline aquifers: analytical solution for CO2 plume evolution during injection. Transport in Porous media, 58, 339–360.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Song, I., Suh, M., Won, K. S. & Haimson, B.2001. A laboratory study of hydraulic fracturing breakdown pressure in tablerock sandstone. Geosciences Journal, 5, 263–271.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522074
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522074
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error