oa Comparative Hydrogeochemical Analysis of Opalinus Clay’s Lithofacies to CO2 Injection Using HYTEC

References

1. Bachu, S., Gunter, W.D., & Perkins, E.H. [1994]. Aquifer disposal of CO2: Hydrodynamic and mineral trapping. Energy Conversion and Management, 35(4), 269–279.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Benson, S.M., & Cole, D.R. [2008]. CO2 sequestration in deep sedimentary formations. Elements, 4(5), 325–331.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bossart, P. et al. [2017]. Mont Terri rock laboratory, 20 years of research: introduction, site characteristics and overview of experiments. Swiss Journal of Geosciences, 110(1), 3–22.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bradbury, M.H., & Baeyens, B. [1998]. A physicochemical characterisation and geochemical modelling approach for determining porewater chemistries in argillaceous rocks. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 62(5), 783–795.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bui, M. et al. [2018]. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): The way forward. Energy & Environmental Science, 11(5), 1062–1176.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chevalier, G., Diamond, L.W., & Leu, W. [2010]. Potential for deep geological sequestration of CO2 in Switzerland: A first appraisal. Swiss Journal of Geosciences, 103(3), 427–455.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Corvisier, J. et al. [2013]. Impact of co-injected gases on CO2 storage sites: Geochemical modeling of experimental results. Energy Procedia, 37, 3699–3710.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Giffaut, E. et al. [2014]. Andra thermodynamic database for performance assessment: ThermoChimie. Applied Geochemistry, 49, 225–236.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hennig, T., Stockmann, M., & Kühn, M. [2020]. Simulation of diffusive uranium transport and sorption processes in the Opalinus Clay. Applied Geochemistry, 123, 104777.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Jaeggi, D. et al. [2024]. Current and planned activities of the Swiss Geological Survey in the context of geological carbon storage. Presented at the 1st Caprock Integrity & Gas Storage Symposium, St-Ursanne, Switzerland.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Lagneau, V., Pipart, A., & Catalette, H. [2005]. Reactive transport modelling and long-term behaviour of CO2 sequestration in saline aquifers. Oil & Gas Science and Technology, 60(2), 231–247.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Marty, N. C. M. et al. [2015]. Benchmarks for multicomponent reactive transport across a cement/clay interface. Computational Geosciences, 19, 635–653.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Pearson, F.J. et al. [2003]. Mont Terri project—Geochemistry of water in the Opalinus Clay Formation at the Mont Terri Rock Laboratory (Technical Report No. 5). Bern: Federal Office for Water and Geology (FOWG).
    [Google Scholar]
14. Rebscher, D. et al. [2019]. CO2 Long-term Periodic Injection Experiment at the Underground Rock Laboratory, Mont Terri. Presented at Underground Laboratories for CO2 Geological Storage Research, 5–6 June 2019, Nancy, France.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Sin, I., & Corvisier, J. [2019]. Multiphase-multicomponent reactive transport and flow modeling. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 85(1), 143–195.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Van Der Lee, J. et al. [2003]. Module-oriented modeling of reactive transport with HYTEC. Computers & Geosciences, 29(3), 265–275.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Yu, C. J. [2017]. Comparative study of convective and diffusive transport phenomena within the Opalinus Clay at Mont Terri. PhD thesis, Aix-Marseille University, France.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Zappone, A. et al. [2018]. CO2 sequestration: Studying caprock and fault sealing integrity, the CS-D experiment in Mont Terri. Presented at the Fifth CO2 Geological Storage Workshop, Utrecht, Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Ziegler, M. et al. [2024]. CO2LPIE: CO2 long-term periodic injection experiment (CL). Presented at the 1st Caprock Integrity & Gas Storage Symposium, St-Ursanne, Switzerland.
    [Google Scholar]