1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

Sequestering CO in geological formations like saline aquifers or depleted petroleum reservoirs is an effective strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. CO injection can be used to improve oil recovery or for long-term storage. While continuous injection is ideal for storage and plume formation, operational constraints frequently necessitate intermittent injection, in which injection phases alternate with shut-in periods.

CO injection causes significant temperature and pressure variations due to hydrostatic, overburden, and injection pressures, which exceed its supercritical point. Intermittent injection causes cooling during injection and reheating during shut-in, resulting in thermal shocks that could effect wellbore integrity. These fluctuations can cause casing expansion and contraction, cement debonding, and microfractures, all of which increase mechanical stress on the well structure. The severity of these effects varies according to injection rate, shut-in duration, reservoir conditions, and rock properties.

This study uses Eclipse E300 to create a compositional model for a well in the Northern Lights project, which includes a non-isothermal integrated wellbore model to evaluate the thermal effects of intermittent injection. Understanding these effects is essential for accurate injectivity predictions, maintaining stable flow conditions, and mitigating thermal stresses that may impact long-term well integrity in CO storage projects.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522088
2025-09-01
2026-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2025/wccus/88.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522088&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bui, Mai, Claire S.Adjiman, AndréBardow, EdwardJ.Anthony, AndyBoston, SolomonBrown, PaulS.Fennell, SabineFuss, AmparoGalindo, and Leigh A.Hackett. 2018. “Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): The Way Forward.” Energy & Environmental Science11(5):1062–1176.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Lima, Viviane De, SandraEinloft, João MarceloKetzer, MichelJullien, OlivierBildstein, and Jean-ClaudePetronin. 2011. “CO2 Geological Storage in Saline Aquifers: Paraná Basin Caprock and Reservoir Chemical Reactivity.” Energy Procedia4: 5377–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Metz, Bert, OgunladeDavidson, HeleenDe Coninck, ManuelaLoos, and LeoMeyer. 2005. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Nassan, Taofik H., CarstenFreese, DirkBaganz, HakanAlkan, OleksandrBurachok, JonasSolbakken, NematollahZamani, Morten GunnarAarra, and MohdAmro. 2024. “Integrity Experiments for Geological Carbon Storage (GCS) in Depleted Hydrocarbon Reservoirs: Wellbore Components under Cyclic CO2 Injection Conditions.” Energies17(12): 3014.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Pawar, Rajesh J., Grant S.Bromhal, J. WilliamCarey, WilliamFoxall, AnnaKorre, Philip S.Ringrose, OwainTucker, Maxwell N.Watson, and Joshua A.White. 2015. “Recent Advances in Risk Assessment and Risk Management of Geologic CO2 Storage.” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control40:292–311.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Shchipanov, Anton, LarsKollbotn, MauroEncinas, and IngebretFjelde. 2022. “Periodic CO2 Injection for Improved Storage Capacity and Pressure Management under Intermittent CO2 Supply.”
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522088
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522088
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error