1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

To achieve effective long-term CO storage in saline aquifers, it is essential to understand and monitor CO distribution and trapping mechanisms, which are significantly influenced by groundwater flow. This study investigates the impact of background flow velocity and direction on CO plume behavior and different trapping mechanisms (residual and solubility) using numerical analysis. The results of simulation show that in the flat (0° dip) model, increasing background flow velocity significantly extends the plume migration distance, enhancing both solubility and residual trapping through a larger CO2-water contact area and increased pore space occupation. The analysis is further extended to a dipping aquifer scenario to assess the role of groundwater flow direction. In the co-current flow case, where water and CO move in the same direction, the plume attains its maximum lateral extension, resulting in the highest storage efficiency. Conversely, in the counter-current flow scenario, where CO and water move in opposite directions, lower CO trapping is observed because, particularly at high velocity, the drag force exerted by water overcomes buoyancy force and limits further plume extension.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522096
2025-09-01
2026-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2025/wccus/96.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522096&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Awag, M., Mackay, E., & Ghanbari, S. (2023). The impact of background water flow on the early migration of a CO2 plume in a tilted aquifer during the post-injection period. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 9(2), 125–135.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Awag, M., Mackay, E., & Ghanbari, S. (2024). Numerical analysis on the direction of groundwater flux effects on the early post-injection migration of a CO2 plume. Carbon Capture Science & Technology, 10, 100153.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Celia, M. A., Bachu, S., Nordbotten, J. M., & Bandilla, K. W. (2015). Status of CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers with emphasis on modeling approaches and practical simulations. Water Resources Research, 51(9), 6846–6892.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Goater, A. L., Bijeljic, B., & Blunt, M. J. (2013). Dipping open aquifers—The effect of top-surface topography and heterogeneity on CO2 storage efficiency. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 17, 318–331.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Harter, T. (2003). Basic Concepts of Groundwater Hydrology.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Jing, J., Yang, Y., & Tang, Z. (2021). Assessing the influence of injection temperature on CO2 storage efficiency and capacity in the sloping formation with fault. Energy, 215, 119097.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kelemen, P., Benson, S. M., Pilorgé, H., Psarras, P., & Wilcox, J. (2019). An Overview of the Status and Challenges of CO2 Storage in Minerals and Geological Formations [Review]. Frontiers in Climate, 1.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522096
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522096
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error