oa CO2-Brine-Rock Interactions: Influence of Reservoir Conditions on Wettability and Storage Efficiency in Dolomite Formations

References

1. Ahmed, M., Paker, D.M., Dindoruk, B., and Drylie, S. [2025]. Experimental Investigation of the Impact of CO2 on Interfacial Tension and Rock Properties in Application to CO2 Storage in Saline Aquifers. Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) Conference and Exhibition, 3–5 March 2025. https://doi.org/10.15530/ccus-2025-4193861.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ahmed, M. Deniz, M. P., Abdulwarith, A., Dindoruk, B., Drylie, S., Gautam, S. [2024b]. Quantification of the Effect of CO2 Storage on CO2 -Brine Relative Permeability in Sandstone Reservoirs: An Experimental and Machine Learning Study. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, September 23–25, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2118/220974-MS.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bachu, S. and Bennion, D.B. [2009]. Dependence of CO2 -Brine Interfacial Tension on Aquifer Pressure, Temperature and Water Salinity. Energy Procedia, 1(1), 3157–3164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.098
   [Google Scholar]
4. Benavides, J., Dindoruk, B., Cherry, A., and Shukla, S. [2025]. Selected Recommended Practices for Increasing the Efficiency and Accuracy of CO2 Sequestration Models. SPE J, 30 (05), 3202–3219. SPE-218232-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/218232-PA.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Celia, M.A., Bachu, S., Nordbotten, J.M., and Bandilla, K.W. [2015]. Status of CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers with emphasis on modeling approaches and practical simulations. Water Resources Research, 51, 6846–6892.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dindoruk, B. and Livescu, S. [2023]. Engineering the Sequestration of Carbon. The Bridge, National Academy of Engineering, Fall 2023, Washington, DC, USA, 44–51. ISSN 0737-6278.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Espinoza, D.N. and Santamarina, J.C. [2010]. Water-CO2-mineral systems: Interfacial tension, contact angle, and diffusion—Implications to CO2 geological storage. Water Resources Research, 46(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008634
   [Google Scholar]
8. IPCC. [2005]. BertMetz, OgunladeDavidson, HeleenDe Coninck, ManuelaLoos and LeoMeyer (Eds.) Cambridge University Press, UK. pp 431. Cambridge University Press, The Edinburgh Building Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 2RU England.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Oyagha, S., Benavides, J., Paker, D.M., Dindoruk, B., Gautam, S. and Ratnakar, R.R. [2025]. Upscaling of Diffusivity in CO2 Storage Processes in Deep Saline Aquifers. Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage conference (CCUS) Conference, Houston, TX, 3–5 March. https://doi.org/10.15530/ccus-2025-4184667.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Paker, D. M., Dindoruk, B., Sagar, S., Baksmaty, L., Ratnakar, R., Samara, H., and Jeager, P. [2025]. An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Pressure and Salinity on IFT in Live Oil/Brine Systems. Processes, 13(6), 1843. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13061843.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ratnakar, R., Venkatraman, A., Kalra, A., and Dindoruk, B. [2020]. On the Prediction of Gas Solubility in Brine Solutions with Single or Mixed Salts: Applications to Gas Injection and CO2 Capture/Sequestration. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 81(2020), 103450.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ratnakar, R.R., Chaubey, V., and Dindoruk, B. [2023]. A Novel Computational Strategy to Estimate CO2 Solubility in Brine Solutions for CCUS Applications. Applied Energy, 342(2023), 121134https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121134
    [Google Scholar]