1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

Disused oil and gas reservoirs and saline aquifers are promising candidates for Carbon Dioxide (CO) storage, which is key for reducing emissions to the atmosphere. Ensuring safe storage of CO requires a thorough assessment of leakage risks and cap rock efficiency, along with continuous monitoring of stress field changes through seismic data. In Brazil, shallow-water, sandstone-rich aquifers near industrial hubs present strong potential for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). The Ponta Aguda deep saline formation, located in the Santos Basin, represents a gigaton-scale storage resource that could support CO storage hubs in the country’s most industrialized region. However, challenges remain in reservoir geomechanics and high-resolution seismic monitoring due to environmental legislation restrictions, complicating predictive modeling efforts. To address these challenges, this study employs simulator-to-seismic modeling, integrating static and dynamic reservoir properties. Fluid substitution was applied to model the elastic properties of CO-saturated rocks, and a Petro-elastic Model (PEM) was designed to capture pressure and saturation effects. A 3D convolution modeling approach using point-spread functions (PSFs) was then implemented to enhance seismic resolution while accounting for acquisition geometry and overburden effects. This methodology aims to optimize monitoring strategies, reduce uncertainty, and ensure the long-term environmental safety of CO storage projects.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522115
2025-09-01
2026-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2025/wccus/115.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522115&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Erdtmann, M. K., Lira, F. S., Menezes, L., & dos Santos, S. B. (2024). Brazilian Offshore Saline Aquifers as CCS Prospects. In Fifth EAGE Global Energy Transition Conference & Exhibition (GET 2024) (Vol. 2024, No. 1, pp. 1–4). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Furre, A.K., Warchol, M.J., Alnes, H., Pontén, A.S.M. (2024). Sleipner 26 years: how well-established subsurface monitoring work processes have contributed to successful offshore CO2 injection. Geoenergy (2024) 2 (1): geoenergy2024-015.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gassmann, F. (1951). Uber die elastizitat poroser medien. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zurich96: 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Greenberg, M.L., Castagna, J.P. (1992). Shear‐wave velocity estimation in porous rocks: theoretical formulation, preliminary verification and applications. Geophysical Prospecting, Volume 40, Issue 2, Mar 1992, p. 195–209.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lecomte, I. [2008]. Resolution and illumination analyses in PSDM: A ray-based approach. The Leading Edge, 27, 650–663.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lecomte, I., Lavadera, P.L., Botter, C., Anell, I., Buckley, S.J., Eide, C.H., Grippa, A., Mascolo, V., Kjoberg, S. [2016]. 2(3) D convolution modelling of complex geological targets beyond – 1D convolution. First Break, 34, pp. 99–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lichtschlag, A., Pearce, C. R., Suominen, M., Blackford, J., Borisov, S. M., Bull, J. M., … & Connelly, D. P. (2021). Suitability analysis and revised strategies for marine environmental carbon capture and storage (CCS) monitoring. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 112, 103510.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T. and Dvorkin, J. (2009) Rock Physics Handbook: Tools for Seismic Analysis in Porous Media. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. MoreiraJ.L.P., MadeiraC.V., GilJ.A., MachadoM.A.P. (2007). Bacia de Santos. Boletim de Geociências da Petrobras. 15(2): 531–549.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ringrose, P.S., Meckel, T.A. (2019). Maturing global CO2 storage resources on offshore continental margins to achieve 2DS emissions reductions. Sci Rep9, 17944.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522115
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522115
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error