1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

The prediction of storage capacity, plume migration, and injection behavior is crucial for the successful implementation of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). Numerical simulators rely on a wide range of geological data, fluid dynamics inputs, and well-related datasets to evaluate CO storage performance. Among these inputs, saturation functions—comprising relative permeability and capillary pressure—play a pivotal role. Notably, displacement mechanisms differ significantly between the near-wellbore region and the deeper reservoir, primarily due to simultaneous mass transfer between phases, particularly when dry CO is injected into water-unsaturated zones.

In this study, we utilize experimental results from published data to investigate how relative permeability and capillary pressure vary across different reservoir regions. By performing history matching of experimental data, we aim to determine whether it is necessary to distinguish between these saturation functions when simulating various parts of the reservoir. The findings demonstrate that realistic relative permeability data, derived through history matching, can effectively represent diverse regions of the reservoir—provided that mass transfer effects are incorporated into near-wellbore simulations. This insight offers valuable guidance for implementing saturation functions from different experimental datasets into reservoir numerical models.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522130
2025-09-01
2026-02-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2025/wccus/130.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522130&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Akbarabadi, M. and Piri, M. [2015]. Co-sequestration of SO2 with supercritical CO2 in carbonates: An experimental study of capillary trapping, relative permeability, and capillary pressure. Advances in Water Resources, 77, 44–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennion, B. and Bachu, S. [2005]. Relative permeability characteristics for supercritical CO2 displacing water in a variety of potential sequestration zones. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE 95547, 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennion, D.B. and Bachu, S. [2008]. Drainage and imbibition relative permeability relationships for supercritical CO2/brine and H2S/brine systems in intergranular sandstone, carbonate, shale, and anhydrite rocks. SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering, 11, 487–496.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brooks, R. and Corey, A. [1964]. Hydraulic Properties of Porous Media. Hydrology Paper No. 3, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Canjar, L.N. and Manning, F.S. [1967]. Thermodynamic Properties and Reduced Correlations for Gases. Gulf Publishing Co., Houston, TX.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. CMG. [2024]. GEM Compositional & Unconventional Simulator. Retrieved from https://www.cmgl.ca/gem.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Egermann, P., Chalbaud, C., Duquerroix, J.-P. and Le Gallo, Y. [2006]. An integrated approach to parameterize reservoir models for CO2 injection in aquifers. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE 102308, 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Harvey, A.H. [1996]. Semiempirical correlation for Henry's constants over large temperature ranges. AIChE Journal, 42, 1491–1494.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. IPCC. [2005]. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Cambridge University Press, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Krevor, S.C.M., Pini, R., Zuo, L. and Benson, S.M. [2012]. Relative permeability and trapping of CO2 and water in sandstone rocks at reservoir conditions. Water Resources Research, 48(2), W02532.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rostami, B., Al-Masri, F., Mohammadkhani, S. and Olsen, D. [2025]. Assessing storage injectivity and rock physics alteration during dry and wet CO2 injection for the storage prospect of the Gassum Formation in the Stenlille Aquifer, Denmark. Energy & Fuels, 39(9), 4395–4411.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Saul, A. and Wagner, W. [1987]. International equations for the saturated properties of ordinary water substance. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 16, 893–901.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Shi, J.-Q., Xue, Z. and Durican, S. [2009]. History matching of CO2 core flooding CT-scan saturation profiles with porosity dependent capillary pressure. Energy Procedia, 1(1), 3205–3211.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Suekane, T., Nobuso, T., Hirai, S. and Kiyota, M. [2008]. Geological storage of carbon dioxide by residual gas and solubility trapping. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2(1), 58–64.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522130
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202522130
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error