1887

Abstract

Summary

CO2 EOR is a mature technology which has been applied either as continuous CO2 injection or CO2 WAG since the early 1970s. The number of CO2 EOR projects are increasing with time and a significant increase in the number of carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects has been observed in the last few years. CCS is a key enabler to reduce carbon emissions, recognized to play a key role in the journey to net zero, delivering low carbon energy and featuring prominently in many countries’ climate action plans.

A comprehensive experimental program was designed to investigate parameters that affect gas/CO2 mobility under 2-phase and 3-phase flow conditions. These measurements provide key input parameters for CCS and/or EOR projects. The core flood experiments were performed under reservoir conditions using live crude oil and carbonate core samples of up to 1 ft long and 2 in. diameter. The core wettability was restored by ageing the core in crude oil for several weeks, except for the two-phase gas-water experiments. All gas injection experiments were performed using vertically oriented cores, with gas injection from the top. The experimental results show that: 1- Gas injection conducted under miscible/near miscible conditions in the presence of immobile connate water has the highest mobility and Krg(Sorm)follows a linear curve as expected for miscible floods, 2-During 3-phase flow experiments, the presence of mobile water has significant impact on gas/ CO2 mobility, where CO2 mobility decreases as the mobile water saturation increased at the start of CO2 injection, 3- Mobile water saturation—whether from alternating injection cycles or high initial water saturation in transition zones—has similar effect on gas mobility and hence reduces Krg(Sorm), 4- Gas relative permeability end point Krg(Sorm) showed no cyclic dependent for all gas injection cycles starting at mobile water saturation, 5- The lowest gas mobility is observed in two-phase gas-water displacements, highlighting the critical role of water in blocking gas flow, and 6- The gas/CO2 relative permeability end points are not dependent on their own saturation alone as assumed in three-phase models, significant variation in the relative permeability end points was measured at the same saturation depending on the presence of mobile water.

The results of this study have important implications for the design and performance predictions of CO2/WAG EOR and CCS projects. For example, the presence of mobile water at the beginning of CO2 injection significantly reduces CO2 mobility and hence improving sweep efficiency. However, the reduction of gas mobility in the presence of mobile water reduces gas injectivity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531034
2025-04-02
2026-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al Zayer, H. and Sohrabi, M. (2020), “Numerical Simulation Guideline of Oil Recovery by Cycle-Dependent Three-Phase Process Using Core Flood Experiments” Presented at the SPE Europec featured at 82nd EAGE Conference and Exhibition.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beygi, M. R., M.Delshad, V. S.Pudugramam, G. A.Pope and M. F.Wheeler (2015). “Novel three-phase compositional relative permeability and three-phase hysteresis models.” SPE Journal20 (01): 21–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Carlson, F.M. (1981): “Simulation of Relative Permeability Hysteresis to the Non-Wetting Phase,” SPE 10157, Presented at the 56th Annual SPE Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Oct. 5–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fatemi, S. M. and Sohrabi, M. (2012): “Cyclic Hysteresis of Three-Phase Relative Permeability Applicable to WAG Injection: Water-Wet and Mixed-Wet Systems under Low Gas/Oil IFT.” SPE-159816-MS, Presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. San Antonio, Texas, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fatemi, S. M. and Sohrabi, M. (2013). Recovery Mechanisms and Relative Permeability for Oil/Gas System at Near-miscible Conditions: Effects of Immobile Water Saturation, Wettability, Hysteresis and Permeability. Energy and Fuels, Vol 27, Issue 5.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Land, C. S. (1968). “Calculation of imbibition relative permeability for two-and three-phase flow from rock properties.” Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal8 (02): 149–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Larsen, J. and A.Skauge (1998). “Methodology for numerical simulation with cycle-dependent relative permeabilities.” SPE-38456-PA, SPE Journal3 (02): 163–173.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Killough, J. E. (1976). “Reservoir Simulation with History-Dependent Saturation Functions,” SPEJ, Trans. AIME261, 37–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Masalmeh, S.K., Hillgartner, H., Al Mjeni, R. and JingX.D., “Simultaneous Injection of Miscible Gas and Polymer (SIMGAP) to Improve Oil Recovery and Sweep Efficiency from Layered Carbonate Reservoirs”, SPE paper 129645-PP, presented at the SPE EOR Conference at Oil & Gas West Asia held in Muscat, Oman, 11–13 April (2010).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Masalmeh, S., Al-Mismari, A., Farzaneh, S.A., Sohrabi, M. (2021): “Laboratory Study to Investigate Cyclic Hysteresis in Miscible and Immiscible WAG Experiments in Carbonate Reservoir”, Paper Presented at the EAGE IOR 2021 conference.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Masalmeh, S. K., Al-Mismari, A., Farzaneh, S.A., Sohrabi, M. (2022). Trapped Gas Saturation Measurement in 2-phase and 3-phase Experiments to Support CCS and CO2 EOR Projects in Carbonate, Paper SPE 210878-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Masalmeh, S., Farzaneh, S.A., Sohrabi, M., Ataei, M.S. and Alshuaibi, M (2023a) “A Systematic Experimental Study to Understand the Performance and Efficiency of Gas Injection in Carbonate Reservoirs”, Paper SPE 200057-PA, Res Eval & Eng, (April 2023), 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Masalmeh, S., Farzaneh, A., Sohrabi, M., Al-Mesmari, A., Al-Hammadi, M. (2023b). Measurement of trapped gas saturation in carbonate rock: comparing 2-phase and 3-phase data to support CCS and CO2 EOR projects. Presented at the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Abu Dhabi, 9–12, October.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Masalmeh, S., Farzaneh, A., Sohrabi, M., Al-Mesmari, A., Al-Hammadi, M. (2025). Experimental Investigation of Factors Affecting Oil Recovery and Displacement Efficiency of CO2 Injection in Carbonate Reservoirs. SPE-218525-PA. SPE J. 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Shahverdi, H. and M.Sohrabi (2015). “Relative permeability characterization for water-alternating-gas injection in oil reservoirs.” SPE Journal21 (03): 799–808.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Skauge, A. and J. AlexLarsen (1994). Three-Phase Relative Permeabilities and Trapped Gas Measurements Related to WAG Processes. Presented at International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Stavanger, Norway, 12–14 September.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Shyeh-Yung, J.J.1991. Mechanisms of Miscible Oil Recovery: Effects of Pressure on Miscible and Near-Miscible Displacements of Oil by Carbon Dioxide. Paper presented at the Annual Technical Conference, Dallas, October 6–9, SPE-22651-MS, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/22651-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Stern, D.1991. Mechanisms of Miscible Oil Recovery: Effects of Pore Level Fluid Distribution. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference, Dallas, October 6–9, SPE-22652-MS, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/22651-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Zidane, A.CO2 Viscosification for Mobility Alteration in Improved Oil Recovery and CO2 Sequestration. Water2023, 15, 1730. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15091730
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531034
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531034
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error