1887

Abstract

Summary

The porous plate method is perhaps the best practice method for measuring capillary pressure curves in porous materials including geological reservoir rocks. Such curves are critical for designing secure CO2 storage, estimating hydrocarbon reserves and optimizing hydrocarbon production. However, these tests suffer from prolonged durations of months, which is costly especially when performed at reservoir conditions. During the test, two (generally different) fluid pressures are assigned on each side of the system and fluid production is measured as a response. When the production has stabilized, the system has obtained a saturation corresponding to a capillary pressure equal to the assigned pressure difference. To maximize the test value, many pressure steps are performed within the available time. We propose utilizing Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for real-time history-matching, interpretation and decision-making for porous plate experiments. Continuously in time we match the obtained data, accounting for the possible range of solutions, and predict the optimal time at which to change the pressure setting and what the next pressures should be. The approach is compared to a predefined strategy and a rule-of-thumb strategy using first synthetic pressure-production data generated by real CO2-water curves from sandstone and then by direct application to real experimental pressure-production data. The results were compared with those obtained from conventional numerical methods.

The strategy leverages the physics of two-phase flow in porous media and underlying initial and boundary conditions with multi-fidelity observational data. Random Fourier embedding effectively captures non-linearities. Training via random collocation point resampling gave more reliable and efficient computations.

The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the applied strategy in calculation of capillary pressure curve, via real-time history-matching of the experimental data and reporting the uncertainties behind the evaluations. These types of experiments are usually associated with high uncertainty in the relative permeabilities. An advantage of our uncertainty-based approach is the ability to determine saturation intervals where the curves can be determined accurately. The approach also predicts the future states of the system and provides suggestions about the later pressure steps of the experiment. Consequently, both time and financial resources are conserved without compromising quality. In fact, the proposed approach assists deciding the best subsequent experimental setting to further optimize information gained, without significant supervision. Additionally, it empowers scientists to optimize the decisions, automize the calculations, reduce test durations and consequently lower the project expenses.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531042
2025-04-02
2026-02-13

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531042
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abbasi, J. and Andersen, P.Ø. [2022] Theoretical comparison of two setups for capillary pressure measurement by centrifuge. Heliyon, 8(9), e10656.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Abbasi, J. and Andersen, P.O. [2024] Application of Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Estimation of Saturation Functions from Countercurrent Spontaneous Imbibition Tests. SPE Journal, 1, 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Abbasi, J., Moseley, B., Kurotori, T, Jagtap, A.D., Kovscek, A.R., Hiorth, A. and Andersen, P. [2024] History-Matching of Imbibition Flow in Multiscale Fractured Porous Media Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs).
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Andersen, P., Evje, S. and Hiorth, A. [2017] Modeling of Spontaneous-Imbibition Experiments With Porous Disk—On the Validity of Exponential Prediction. SPE Journal, 22(05), 1326–1337.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Andersen, P.Ø. [2023a] Early-and late-time prediction of counter-current spontaneous imbibition, scaling analysis and estimation of the capillary diffusion coefficient. Transport in Porous Media, 147(3), 573–604.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Andersen, P. [2023b] Early- and Late-Time Prediction of Counter-Current Spontaneous Imbibition, Scaling Analysis and Estimation of the Capillary Diffusion Coefficient. Transport in Porous Media, 147(3), 573–604.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Andersen, P. [2023c] Intercept Method for Accurately Estimating Residual Fluid Saturation and Approximate Transient Solutions with Production Time Scales in Centrifuge Core Plug Experiments. SPE Journal, 28(06), 3025–3045.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bear, J. [2018] Modeling Phenomena of Flow and Transport in Porous Media, 31. Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Corey, A. [1954] The interrelation between gas and oil relative permeabilities. Producers Monthly, 19(1), 38–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Dernaika, M., Wilson, O.B., Skjaeveland, S.M., Ebeltoft, E., Laboratories, W. and Dhabi, A. [2010] DRAINAGE CAPILLARY PRESSURE AND RESISTIVITY INDEX FROM SHORT-WAIT POROUS PLATE EXPERIMENTS, 4–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Graue, A., Moe, R. and Baldwin, B.A. [2000] Comparison of Numerical Simulations and Laboratory Waterfloods with In-Situ Saturation Imaging of Fractured Blocks of Reservoir Rocks at Different Wettabilities. Proceedings of the SPE International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition of Mexico, 447–460.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Jagtap, A.D., Mao, Z., Adams, N. and Karniadakis, G.E. [2022] Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in supersonic flows. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.11821.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Karniadakis, G.E., Kevrekidis, I.G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S. and Yang, L. [2021] Physics-informed machine learning.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Kingma, D.P and Ba, J.L. [2014] Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015 - Conference Track Proceedings
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Lenormand, R., Delaplace, P. and Schmitz, P. [1998] Can we really measure the relative permeabilities using the micropore membrane method?Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 19(1–2), 93–102.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Lohne, A., Nødland, O., Stavland, A. and Hiorth, A. [2017] A model for non-Newtonian flow in porous media at different flow regimes. Comput Geosci, 21, 1289–1312.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Lomeland, F, Ebeltoft, E. and Thomas, W.H. [2008] A new versatile capillary pressure correlation. In: Paper SCA 2008–08 presented at the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts held in Abu Dhabi, UAE, 29.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Manthey, S., Hassanizadeh, S.M. and Helmig, R. [2005] Macro-scale dynamic effects in homogeneous and heterogeneous porous media. Upscaling Multiphase Flow in Porous Media: From Pore to Core and Beyond, 58(1–2), 121–145.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. McPhee, C., Reed, J. and Zubizarreta, I. [2015] Core analysis: a best practice guide. Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P. and Karniadakis, G.E. [2019] Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686–707.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang, E., Dao, M., Karniadakis, G.E. and Suresh, S. [2022] Analyses of internal structures and defects in materials using physics-informed neural networks. Science Advances, 8(7), 644.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531042
Loading
Application of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for Real-time Interpretation of Porous Plate Capillary Pressure Tests
Conference Proceedings 2025, 1 (2025); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202531042
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531042
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531042
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error