1887

Abstract

Summary

Since the early 1960s polymer flooding has been shown to be an effective enhanced oil recovery (EOR) method across hundreds of applications. Until recently, screening criteria typically stated that the upper limit of oil viscosity was ∼150 mPa.s for successful implementation. This was predicated on the understanding that polymer flooding operated via a mechanism of mobility control whereby the addition of water-soluble polymer to the injection stream reduced the mobility ratio between the water and oil to near unity, giving a stabledisplacement.

In more recent years, there has been a significant number of laboratory and field observations of effective polymer flooding of heavy oil with viscosities >> 150 mPa.s. In these cases, the mobility ratio with polymer flooding is still significantly >>1, yet high recovery efficiencies are observed. suggested that this was due to a form of viscous crossflow taking place during polymer injection. Similar to viscous crossflow between layers, the injection of the viscosified water phase results in crossflow at the trailing front of water out of the viscous finger and crossflow of bypassed oil into the viscous finger at the leading front.

This work demonstrates the viscous crossflow mechanism via a series of laboratory and numerical experiments. First, a visualised example of viscous crossflow is presented, then a series of miscible simulations performed to demonstrate viscous crossflow the absence of relative permeability, capillary pressure etc. along with a series of immiscible calculations. The immiscible simulations directly match literature experiments of viscous crossflow and show a high degree of portability between experiments of the same adverse viscosity ratio. In each case, viscous crossflow is evidenced and literature results justified under these assumptions.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531053
2025-04-02
2026-02-15

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531053
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barnes, A.L.: The Use of a Viscous Slug To Improve Waterflood Efficiency In a Reservoir Partially Invaded by Bottom Water. Journal of Petroleum Technology14(10), 1147–1153 (1962). SPE-334. https://doi.org/10.2118/334-PA
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Beteta, A., Sorbie, K.S., Skauge, A.: Immiscible Viscous Fingering: The Simulation of Tertiary Polymer Displacements of Viscous Oils in 2D Slab Floods. Polymers14(19) (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/polvm14194159
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Beteta, A., Sorbie, K.S., McIver, K.: Experimental Observations and Modelling of the Effect of Wettability on Immiscible Viscous Fingers at the Darcy Scale. Physics of Fluids36(4), 044111 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0204036
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Delamaide, E., Zaitoun, A., Renard, G., Tabary, R.: Pelican Lake Field: First Successful Application of Polymer Flooding In a Heavy-Oil Reservoir. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering17(03), 340–354 (2014). SPE-165234. https://doi.org/10.2118/165234-PA
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Detling, K.D.: Process of Recovering Oil from Oil Sands. US Patent2,341,500, 1944.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Levitt, D., Jouenne, S., Bondino, I., Santanach-Carreras, E., Bourrel, M.: Polymer Flooding of Heavy Oil Under Adverse Mobility Conditions. Presented at the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2–4 July, 2013. SPE-165267. https://doi.org/10.2118/165267-MS
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Pye, D.J.: Improved Secondary Recovery by Control of Water Mobility. Journal of Petroleum Technology16, 911–916 (1964). SPE-845. https://doi.org/10.2118/845-pa
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Sandiford, B.B.: Laboratory and Field Studies of Water Floods Using Polymer Solutions to Increase Oil Recoveries. Journal of Petroleum Technology16, 917–922 (1964). SPE-844. https://doi.org/10.2118/844-PA
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Seright, R.S., Wang, D., Lerner, N., Nguyen, A., Sabid, J., Tochor, R.: Can 25-cP Polymer Solution Efficiently Displace 1,600-cP Oil During Polymer Flooding?SPE Journal23, 2260–2278 (2018). SPE-190321. https://doi.org/10.2118/190321-PA
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Skauge, A., Ormehaug, P.A., Gurholt, T., Vik, B., Bondino, I., Hamon, G.: 2-D Visualisation of Unstable Waterflood and Polymer Flood for Displacement of Heavy Oil. SPE Improved Oil Recovery ConferenceTulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 14–18 April (2012). SPE-154292. https://doi.org/10.2118/154292-MS
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Skauge, A., Shiran, B.S., Ormehaug, P.A., Carreras, E.S., Klimenko, A., Levitt, D.: X-ray CT Investigation of Displacement Mechanisms for Heavy Oil Recovery by Low Concentration HPAM Polymers. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 31 August - 3 September, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2118/200461-ms
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Sorbie, K.S.: Polymer Improved Oil Recovery. Blackie, Glasgow, Scotland (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/978–94-011-3044-8
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Sorbie, K.S., Skauge, A.: Mobilization of By-Passed Oil by Viscous Crossflow in EOR Processes. Presented at the 20th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Pau, France, 8–11 April, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201900057
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Sorbie, K.S., Al Ghafri, A.Y., Skauge, A., Mackay, E.J.: On the Modelling of Immiscible Viscous Fingering in Two - Phase Flow in Porous Media. Transport in Porous Media135, 331–359 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-020-01479-w
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Zapata, V.J., Lake, L.W.: A Theoretical Analysis of Viscous Crossflow. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 4–7 October, 1981. SPE-10111. https://doi.org/10.2118/10111-MS
     [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531053
Loading
Evidence of Viscous Crossflow during Polymer Enhanced Oil Recovery
Conference Proceedings 2025, 1 (2025); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202531053
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531053
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531053
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error