1887

Abstract

Summary

This study investigates the impact of wellbore lateral heat transfer — often overlooked in prior research — on the performance of high-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage (HT-ATES) systems. First, we implemented a fully coupled in-house wellbore simulator (MOSKIO) integrated with a reservoir simulator (PorousFlow) under the framework of MOOSE, comparing the numerical and analytical modeling approaches, and the approach without considering wellbore lateral heat transfer for assessing wellbore lateral heat transfer in a 3D multi-layer HT-ATES system with five-wellbore. Second, we studied the impacts of different wellbore configurations, reservoir properties and operational parameters on the HT-ATES performance. The analysis focused on performance indicators such as energy recovery efficiency, extracted energy, wellbore lateral heat loss fraction and reservoir heat loss fraction. The typical maximum wellbore lateral heat loss fraction, calculated using the analytical approach, is about ∼6%, slightly lower than that from the numerical approach, 7%, due to static temperature assumptions in the far-field formation. While the analytical approach offers slightly faster estimations for preliminary assessments, the numerical approach remains essential for capturing complex thermal interactions and providing precise long-term performance predictions. Smaller wellbore diameters (e.g., 6.75 inches) improve energy recovery efficiency but yield higher well pressure drops. The number of supporting wells significantly influences HT-ATES performance, with 2∼3 supporting wells providing better energy recovery efficiency and reduced heat loss. Lower conductivity casing materials (e.g., 0.045 W•m−1•K−1) significantly mitigate heat loss, while proper inter-well distances balance thermal breakthrough, system performance and operational constraints. Higher flow rates (e.g., 25 L•s−1) and elevated injection fluid temperatures (e.g., 210°C) also enhance energy recovery and reduce heat losses. Longer storage durations (e.g., nine months) initially distribute heat within the aquifer but may decrease energy recovery efficiency over time. This study highlights the critical role of wellbore lateral heat loss in evaluating the performance of the HT-ATES system, offering insights for more effective thermal energy management.

Impact of wellbore lateral heat transfer on the performance of high-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage system

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531057
2025-04-02
2026-02-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Beernink, S., Hartog, N., Vardon, P. J., & Bloemendal, M. (2024). Heat losses in ATES systems: The impact of processes, storage geometry and temperature. Geothermics, 117, 102889.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Geuzaine, C, & Remade, J. F. (2009). Gmsh: A 3-D finite element mesh generator with built-in pre-and post-processing facilities. International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 79(11), 1309–1331.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Korzani, M. G., Nitschke, F., Held, S., & Kohl, T. (2019). The development of a fully coupled wellbore-reservoir simulator for geothermal application. In Geothermal: Green Energy for the Long Run-Geothermal Resources Council 2019 Annual Meeting, GRC 2019 (pp. 927–936). Geothermal Resources Council.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Permann, C. J., Gaston, D. R., Andrs, D., Carlsen, R. W., Kong, F., Lindsay, A. D., … & Martineau, R. C. (2020). MOOSE: Enabling massively parallel multiphysics simulation. SoftwareX, 11, 100430.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Peaceman, D. W. (1983). Interpretation of well-block pressures in numerical reservoir simulation with nonsquare grid blocks and anisotropic permeability. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 23(03), 531–543.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ramey Jr, H. J. (1962). Wellbore heat transmission. Journal of petroleum Technology, 14(04), 427–435.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sheldon, H. A., Wilkins, A., & Green, C. P. (2021). Recovery efficiency in high-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage systems. Geothermics, 96, 102173.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ShiD., ChengS., WangQ., LiuD., YinFu, XuX., GuoX., & WengZ. (2024). Comparative analysis and application of mass and heat transfer simulation in fractured reservoirs based on two fracture models. Processes, 12(11), 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Vidal, R., Olivella, S., Saaltink, M. W., & Diaz-Maurin, F. (2022). Heat storage efficiency, ground surface uplift and thermo-hydro-mechanical phenomena for high-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage. Geothermal Energy, 10(1), 23.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wilkins, A., Green, C. P., & Ennis-King, J. (2021). An open-source multiphysics simulation code for coupled problems in porous media. Computers & Geosciences, 154, 104820.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Willhite, G. P. (1967). Over-all heat transfer coefficients in steam and hot water injection wells. Journal of Petroleum technology, 19(05), 607–615.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Xiong, W., Bahonar, M., & Chen, Z. (2016). Development of a thermal wellbore simulator with focus on improving heat-loss calculations for steam-assisted-gravity-drainage steam injection. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 19(02), 305–315.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531057
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531057
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error