1887

Abstract

Summary

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has emerged as a critical strategy in the global effort to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change. In the context of CCS, the interaction between injected CO2 and resident fluids in geological formations is of paramount importance. Given the significant viscosity ratio between water and supercritical CO2, the flow dynamics in these systems are expected to be affected by viscous fingering (VF). Viscous fingering is an instability that occurs when a lower viscosity fluid displaces a higher viscosity fluid in a porous medium. If VF does occur, then it has important implications for the efficiency and long-term behaviour of CO2 storage operations. The dissolution of carbon dioxide in water also plays a vital role in enhancing the integrity of the carbon storage process. However, questions remain regarding the influence of CO2 solubility on viscous fingering dynamics.

This study employs numerical simulations to demonstrate the presence of viscous fingering during carbon dioxide injection in storage formations. We investigate the impact of CO2 solubility on the development of fingering patterns and breakthrough times using a two-dimensional heterogeneous permeability model. In our simulation model, we maintained a constant bottomhole gas injection rate across various pressure conditions while investigating the effects of CO2 solubility. We observed a consistent delay in breakthrough time when CO2 solubility was activated, compared to simulations without solubility. However, the magnitude of this delay diminished at higher pressures. At higher pressures, although the absolute quantity of dissolved CO2 increases, the proportion of CO2 in the supercritical state also rises significantly. The presence of a larger fraction of supercritical CO2 at elevated pressures maintains a higher-pressure gradient within the system. Consequently, this mitigates the reduction in pressure drop that was more pronounced in lower pressure scenarios where dissolution effects were relatively more dominant.

The inclusion of CO2 solubility in our numerical simulation model does not prevent the formation of viscous fingers. However, it significantly alters the morphology of the fingering patterns, with these changes being pressure-dependent. Additionally, we examined the impact of viscous fingering on CO2 dissolution in water by comparing conventional relative permeability with relative permeability that accounts for viscous fingering effects. Indeed, we will present results showing that none of the published CO2/water relative permeabilities lead to the correct viscous fingering behaviour in CO2 - water displacement at the large scale.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531064
2025-04-02
2026-02-11

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531064
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Lan, X., Tans, P. and Thoning, K.W.Trends in globally-averaged CO2 determined from NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory measurements.; Version Monday, 06-Jan-2025 10:06:16 MST.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ding, S., Xi, Y., Jiang, H., & Liu, G., CO2 storage capacity estimation in oil reservoirs by solubility and mineral trapping. Applied Geochemistry, 2018. 89: p. 121–128.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bachu, S., CO2 storage in geological media: Role, means, status and barriers to deployment. Progress in energy and combustion science, 2008. 34(2): p. 254–273.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Juanes, R., Spiteri, E. J., Orr Jr, F. M., & Blunt, M. J., Impact of relative permeability hysteresis on geological CO2 storage. Water resources research, 2006. 42(12).
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Ennis-King, J., Preston, I., & Paterson, L.. Role of convective mixing in the long-term storage of carbon dioxide in deep saline formations. in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. 2003.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Benson, S.M., & Cole, D. R., CO2 sequestration in deep sedimentary formations. Elements, 2008. 4(5): p. 325–331.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bachu, S., & Adams, J. J., Sequestration of CO2 in geological media in response to climate change: capacity of deep saline aquifers to sequester CO2 in solution. Energy Conversion and management, 2003. 44(20): p. 3151–3175.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang, W., Li, Y., Xu, T., Cheng, H., Zheng, Y., & Xiong, P., Long-term variations of CO2 trapped in different mechanisms in deep saline formations: A case study of the Songliao Basin, China. International journal of greenhouse gas control, 2009. 3(2): p. 161–180.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Sayegh, S.G., & Najman, J., Phase behavior measurements of CO2‐SO2‐brine mixtures. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1987. 65(2): p. 314–320.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Spycher, N., Pruess, K., & Ennis-King, J., CO2-H2O mixtures in the geological sequestration of CO2. I. Assessment and calculation of mutual solubilities from 12 to 100 C and up to 600 bar. Geochimica et cosmochimica acta, 2003. 67(16): p. 3015–3031.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Wiebe, R., The Binary System Carbon Dioxide-Water under Pressure. Chemical reviews, 1941. 29(3): p. 475–481.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Lindberg, E., & Wessel-Berg, D., Vertical convection in an aquifer column under a CO2 gas cap. Energy Convers. Mgmt, 1996. 38: p. 229–234.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Hassanzadeh, H., Pooladi-Darvish, M., & Keith, D. W., Stability of a fluid in a horizontal saturated porous layer: effect of non-linear concentration profile, initial, and boundary conditions. Transport in Porous Media, 2006. 65: p. 193–211.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Ennis-King, J., Preston, I., & Paterson, L., Onset of convection in anisotropic porous media subject to a rapid change in boundary conditions. Physics of Fluids, 2005. 17(8).
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Class, H., Weishaupt, K., & Trötschler, O., Experimental and simulation study on validating a numerical model for CO2 density-driven dissolution in water. Water, 2020. 12(3): p. 738.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. RayleighInvestigation of the character of the equilibrium of an incompressible heavy fluid of variable density. Proceedings of the London mathematical society, 1882. 1(1): p. 170–177.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Taylor, G.I., The instability of liquid surfaces when accelerated in a direction perpendicular to their planes. I. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1950. 201(1065): p. 192–196.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Saffman, P.G. and G.I.Taylor, The penetration of a fluid into a porous medium or Hele-Shaw cell containing a more viscous liquid. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1958. 245(1242): p. 312–329.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Sorbie, K.S., Al Ghafri, A. Y., Skauge, A., & Mackay, E. J., On the modelling of immiscible viscous fingering in two-phase flow in porous media. Transport in Porous Media, 2020. 135(2): p. 331–359.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Beteta, A., Sorbie, K. S., McIver, K., Johnson, G., Gasimov, R., & van Zeil, W., The role of immiscible fingering on the mechanism of secondary and tertiary polymer flooding of viscous oil. Transport in Porous Media, 2022. 143(2): p. 343–372.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Beteta, A., Sorbie, K. S., Skauge, A., & Skauge, T., Immiscible viscous fingering: The effects of wettability/capillarity and scaling. Transport in Porous Media, 2024. 151(1): p. 85–118.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Salmo, I.C., Sorbie, K. S., Skauge, A., & Alzaabi, M. A., Immiscible viscous fingering: modelling unstable water–oil displacement experiments in porous media. Transport in Porous Media, 2022. 145(2): p. 291–322.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Bennion, D.B., & Bachu, S.Drainage and imbibition CO2/brine relative permeability curves at reservoir conditions for carbonate formations. in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. 2010.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Soroush, M., Wessel-Berg, D., Torsaeter, O., & Kleppe, J., Investigating impact of flow rate and wettability on residual trapping in CO2 storage in saline aquifers through relative permeability experiments. Energy and Environment Research, 2013. 3(2): p. 53.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Berg, S., & Ott, H., Stability of CO2–brine immiscible displacement. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2012. 11: p. 188–203.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Bennion, D.B., & Bachu, S,. Dependence on Temperature, Pressure, and Salinity of the IFT and Relative Permeability Displacement Characteristics of CO2 Injected in Deep Saline Aquifers. in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. 2006.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. CMG; Computer Modelling Group Ltd. (CMG): Calgary, A., Canada, 2021.
  28. AshtariLarki, S., Skauge, A., Sorbie, K.S., Mackay, EJ., Numerical Simulation of Viscous Fingering in CO2 Storage: Addressing the Limitations of Laboratory-Derived Relative Permeabilities. international journal of greenhouse gas control, 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Beteta, A., Sorbie, K. S., & Skauge, A., Immiscible viscous fingering: The simulation of tertiary polymer displacements of viscous oils in 2D slab floods. Polymers, 2022. 14(19): p. 4159.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531064
Loading
Viscous Fingering Dynamics in Carbon Capture: Impact of CO2 Solubility and Relative Permeability Selection in CCS
Conference Proceedings 2025, 1 (2025); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202531064
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531064
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531064
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error