1887

Abstract

Summary

Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) techniques have become crucial in the oil and gas industry to maximize the recovery of oil reserves. One such technique is the use of surfactants to increase the efficiency of oil recovery from unconventional sources.

The formulation and evaluation of surfactants for EOR applications have been extensively studied in laboratory settings. Various parameters such as surfactant concentration, pH, salinity, and temperature are evaluated to determine the effectiveness of the surfactant in reducing interfacial tension and surface wettability modification. However, the effectiveness of surfactants in the laboratory does not always translate to field applications.

This manuscript aims to investigate the formulation and evaluation of surfactants for unconventional EOR applications by combining laboratory evaluations with field examples. The laboratory evaluations will focus on the effect of various parameters on surfactant performance, while the specific field examples will provide real-world applications of surfactants in EOR and their outcomes. The paper will also evaluate the challenges associated with surfactant use in field applications and the strategies employed to overcome these challenges.

Overall, this paper provides insights into the formulation and evaluation of surfactants for EOR applications. It highlights the importance of combining laboratory evaluations with field examples to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of surfactants in unconventional EOR. The discussions in this paper can be useful for researchers, engineers, and industry professionals involved in EOR applications.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531065
2025-04-02
2026-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AdkinsJ, TuckerJ.The Role of Foam in Gas-Enhanced Oil Recovery: Mitigating Channeling and Improving Sweep Efficiency. J Pet Sci Eng. 2020;184:106409. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2020.106409.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.106409 [Google Scholar]
  2. Adkins, S., & Tucker, R. (2020). Laboratory Evaluation of Surfactants for Unconventional Reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 185, 106657.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. AlvarezJO, TagavifarM, DoorwarS, et al.Design of Chemical EOR in Unconventional Reservoirs. Presented at: Unconventional Resources Technology Conference; June 13–15, 2023; Denver, CO. doi:10.15530/urtec‑2023‑3870505.
    https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2023-3870505 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alvarez, J.O., & Schechter, D.S. (2017). The Impact of Surfactant Imbibition and Adsorption for Improving Oil Recovery in the Wolfcamp and Eagle Ford Reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 156, 92–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. AtaceriIZ, HaddixGW, SchechterDS, et al.Surfactant Huff n Puff Field Trials in Eagle Ford Shale – A Treatment Design Comparative Analysis. Presented at: SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference; April 22–25, 2024; Tulsa, OK. doi:10.2118/218135‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/218135-MS [Google Scholar]
  6. JwedaJ, BoneR, El-SobkyH, et al.A Systematic Laboratory and Model-Based Surfactant Screening Workflow for Enhanced Recovery Via Wettability Alteration in the Eagle Ford. Presented at: Unconventional Resources Technology Conference; June 13–15, 2023; Denver, CO. doi:10.15530/urtec‑2023‑3866246.
    https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2023-3866246 [Google Scholar]
  7. Myers, D. (2005). Surfactant Science and Technology, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. PinnawalaGW, WestS, NizamidinN, AlexisDA, DwarakanathV.Chemical EOR Field Support Including Surfactant Blending Studies and Quality Control for Shale and Tight Assets. Presented at: SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference; April 22–25, 2024; Tulsa, OK. doi:10.2118/218138‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/218138-MS [Google Scholar]
  9. PospisilS, JoshiS, StokleyA, et al.Surfactant EOR Improves Oil Recovery in a Depleted Eagle Ford Unconventional Well – A Case Study. Presented at: Unconventional Resources Technology Conference; June 13–15, 2023; Denver, CO. doi:10.15530/urtec‑2023‑3831548.
    https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2023-3831548 [Google Scholar]
  10. Rosen, M. J. (2012). Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena, 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. SaputraIWR, SchechterDS.The Impact of Surfactant Molecular Structure on Enhanced Oil Recovery Performance in Unconventional Reservoirs. J Pet Sci Eng. 2019;181:106206. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106206.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106206 [Google Scholar]
  12. Sheng, J. J. (2017). Optimization of Surfactant Formulations for Low-Permeability Shale Oil Recovery. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 159, 716–722.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Siddiqui, Mohammad & Redhwi, Halim & Al-Arfaj, Abdulrahman & Achilias, Dimitris. (2021). Chemical Recycling of PET in the Presence of the Bio-Based Polymers, PLA, PHB and PEF: A Review. Sustainability. 13. 10528. 10.3390/su131910528.
    https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910528 [Google Scholar]
  14. VijapurapuR, SarmahA, SchechterDS, NasrabadiH.Laboratory Investigation of a Novel Hybrid Surfactant-Gas Enhanced Oil Recovery for Tight Oil Reservoirs. Presented at: SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference; April 22–25, 2024; Tulsa, OK. doi:10.2118/218280‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/218280-MS [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, J. et al., (2019). Surfactant-Mediated Wettability Alteration in Shale Formations: A Review. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 578, 123590.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531065
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531065
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error