1887

Abstract

Summary

Data Physics Models (DPM) integrate Machine Learning (ML) with traditional physics-based simulation, leveraging the strengths of both methodologies: the predictive ability of numerical simulations and the speed of data-driven, analytical models. DPMs are developed in a matter of months and run in minutes, enabling the possibility of running thousands of scenarios and the creation of a Pareto front. By evaluating multiple trade-offs across different objectives, engineers can implement closed-loop reservoir optimization.

Approximately 70% of oil fields have matured, requiring additional support for drive mechanisms and fluid displacement for improved oil recovery (IOR). This situation requires faster reservoir management practices to enable quick decision-making, such as adjusting water injection strategies to maintain or boost production. DPMs have proven to be ideal for these mature fields due to their ability to rapidly generate and optimize models, adapting to the continuously changing operational and reservoir conditions. Also, this approach has given impactful results for other field development plan activities like in-fill drilling site selection, bottom-hole pressure (BHP) management, well reactivations, and conversions. The novel approach described in this paper enhances these applications by optimizing across multiple workflows simultaneously. A “Pareto of Paretos” is generated by combining and optimizing these scenarios, offering a comprehensive, multi-dimensional solution for Capex/Opex allocation. Each point on this Pareto surface represents an optimal set of strategies for resource distribution, including injection control, in-fill well placement, well conversions, reactivations, and downhole pump pressure adjustments.

The case study presented in this paper demonstrates the practical implementation of this approach in a field in Colombia. A DPM was developed in three months to model field operations, generating individual scenario recommendations. The optimization framework effectively balanced Capex and Opex, resulting in a strategic plan that maximized Net Present Value (NPV) over a defined period. The outcome provided a detailed set of actionable insights across multiple operational areas, leading to more informed decision-making and higher financial returns vs. individual optimizations. The value creation has been identified to be greater than 10% vs the current state.

This combined physics-machine learning methodology exemplifies the next generation of decision support systems in oil and gas, especially for mature fields. It significantly improves the speed and quality of operational planning and capital allocation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531066
2025-04-02
2026-02-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. F.Gutiérrez et al. (2024). Optimizing Capex and Opex Strategies Using Data Physics Models. Keynote presentation at the Third EAGE Workshop on EOR, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gomez et al. (2021). Application of a Combination of Machine Learning and Reservoir Physics to Increase Production in a Mature Waterflood Field in the San Jorge Basin in Argentina. Proceedings Paper SPE-207897-MS presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Nov 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. P.Sarma et al. (2020). Evaluating and Optimizing a Program to Reactivate Water Injectors in a Mature Field by Integrating Conventional Physics with Artificial Intelligence. Paper SPE-203046-MS presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Nov 9–12, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. S.Kyriacou et al. (2017). Constrained, Multi-Objective, Steamflood Injection Redistribution Optimization using a Cloud-distributed, Metamodel-assisted, Memetic Optimization Algorithm. Proceedings Paper SPE-186010-MS presented at the SPE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, UAE, May 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531066
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531066
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error