1887

Abstract

Summary

This study evaluates the performance of polymer flooding in a complex, multilayered reservoir, where isolated layers exhibit varying degrees of connectivity. Throughout the polymer flooding pilot, produced fluid samples were collected at different stages and analyzed to determine polymer concentration and chemical composition. Aging tests were also conducted under reservoir conditions to track changes in the polymer’s chemical composition over time, offering insights into how the polymer behaves in situ.

Initially, the pilot area contributed around 1.5% to the total field response. After polymer injection, this contribution increased to approximately 12%, with oil production rising between 4 to 10 times, depending on the producers. Water cut dropped from an average of 97% to 80%, and in some areas, it decreased as much as 36%. However, the oil response across the pilot area was uneven, driven by differing levels of connectivity between the reservoir layers. In some sections, a rapid oil response was observed, accompanied by early polymer breakthrough at high concentrations and limited hydrolysis, quickly followed by a decline in oil rate. This suggests preferential flow through a specific layer, allowing for fast but short-lived oil recovery, leaving other layers poorly swept. Conversely, in other sections, oil production increased more gradually, with delayed polymer breakthrough at lower concentrations and higher polymer hydrolysis rates. This indicates better fluid distribution across multiple layers, leading to more stable oil production over time.

The chemical composition of the produced polymer correlated with its residence time in the reservoir and matched well with the results of thermal stability tests conducted in the laboratory at reservoir temperature. This consistency suggests that the polymer’s integrity and effectiveness can be predicted based on its exposure to the reservoir’s thermal and chemical conditions.

By integrating polymer concentration and composition data with field production results, this approach enables operators to identify areas of strong connectivity and to make targeted decisions for improving polymer flooding efficiency. Interventions such as selectively closing certain layers or performing conformance control treatments can optimize fluid distribution and enhance overall recovery.

Furthermore, this methodology can be refined by incorporating tracer and ILT data, offering a more comprehensive understanding of reservoir dynamics. These insights provide a robust framework for optimizing polymer injection strategies in complex, heterogeneous reservoirs, ultimately maximizing polymer flooding efficiency.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531078
2025-04-02
2026-02-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Antignard, S., Giovannetti, B., Divers, T., Dupuis, G., Gaillard, N., Favero, C. “Thermal Stability Evaluation of EOR Polymer: Best Practices & Guidelines”, Paper presented at the IOR 2019 – 20th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Pau, France, April 2019, Volume 2019, pages 1–12, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201900160
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dupuis, G., Antignard, S., Giovannetti, B., Gaillard, N., Jouenne, S., Bourdarot, G., Morel, D., Zaitoun, A. “A New Thermally Stable Synthetic Polymer for Harsh Conditions of Middle East Reservoirs. Part I. Thermal Stability and Injection in Carbonate Cores”, Paper presented at the SPE Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, November 2017, https://doi.org/10.2118/188479-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dupuis, G., Metidji, M. Ould, Terra, N., Nesbit, J., Mishra, A., Kamal, D., M. T.Al-Murayri. “First Field Implementation of a Universal Method to Determine Polymer Concentration in Production Fluids During Polymer Flooding Operations Using Size Exclusion Chromatography”, Paper presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, April 2024, https://doi.org/10.2118/218142-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Moradi-Araghi, A., Doe, P. H. “Hydrolysis and Precipitation of Polyacrylamides in Hard Brines at Elevated Temperatures”, SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1987, pages 189–198, https://doi.org/10.2118/13033-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Rodriguez, L., Antignard, S., Giovannetti, B., Dupuis, G., Gaillard, N., Jouenne, S., Bourdarot, G., Morel, D., Zaitoun, A., Grassl, B. “A New Thermally Stable Synthetic Polymer for Harsh Conditions of Middle East Reservoirs: Part II. NMR and Size Exclusion Chromatography to Assess Chemical and structural Changes During Thermal Stability Tests”, Paper presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, April 2018, https://doi.org/10.2118/190200-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ryles, R. G. “Chemical Stability Limits of Water-Soluble Polymers Used in Oil Recovery Processes”, SPE Rservoir Engineering, 1988, https://doi.org/10.2118/13585-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sandengen, K., Widerøe, H.C., Nurmi, L., Hanski, S. “Hydrolysis kinetics of ATBS polymers at elevated temperature, via 13C NMR spectroscopy, as basis for accelerated aging tests”, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Volume 158, 2017, Pages 680–692, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.09.013
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sandengen, K., Meldahl, M.M., Gjersvold, B., Molesworth, P., Gaillard, N., Braun, O., Antignard, S. “Long term stability of ATBS type polymers for enhanced oil recovery”, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Volume 169, 2018, Pages 532–545, ISSN 0920-4105, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.06.001
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Scoggins, M. W., Miller, J. W. “Spectrophotometric determination of water-soluble organic amides”, Analytical Chemistry, 197547 (1), Pages 152–154, https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60351a032
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Seright, R., Wang, D. “Impact of Salinity, Hardness, Lithology, and ATBS Content on HPAM Polymer Retention for the Milne Point Polymer Flood”, Paper presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, May 2023, https://doi.org/10.2118/212946-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Taylor, Kevin C. “Spectrophotometric Determination of Acrylamide Polymers by Flow Injection Analysis”, SPE Advanced Technology Series1, 1993, Pages 130–133, https://doi.org/10.2118/21007-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Terra, N., Ould Metidji, M., Dupuis, G., De Vita, A., Diaz, P., Ylitch, E. Y. “Insights on Residence Time and Hydrolysis Degree Through Back-Produced Polymer Quantification: A Field Case”, Paper presented at the Third EAGE Workshop on EOR, Buenos Aires, Argentina, October 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531078
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202531078
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error