1887

Abstract

Summary

The Mercia Mudstone Group (MMG) has been cited as a potential caprock to CO storage, and is being considered as a potential host rock for the UK’s first Geological Disposal Facility. 18 samples of core have been collected throughout a continuous succession of MMG, and have undergone a range of experimental analyses in order to obtain controlling factors on permeability, permeability anisotropy and pressure sensitivity. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and petrographic analysis has shown a complex suite of detrital and early diagenetic minerals, resulting from an arid, continental environment of deposition. Mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) revealed a diverse range of mean pore throat sizes within the meso- to macroporous range, and porosity values ranging from 3.2% to 13.4%. These samples of MMG show a range in measured permeabilities, spanning 6 orders of magnitude. Permeability anisotropy within individual samples reach up to 3 orders of magnitude. More than 600 individual gas permeability measurements have been undertaken on these MMG samples, revealing the sealing potential of the different stratigraphic horizons present at depth. This extensive dataset will provide useful inputs for upscaling and predicating fluid migration under varying stress conditions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202532010
2025-09-14
2026-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Armitage, P., Worden, R. H., Faulkner, D. R., Aplin, A., Butcher, A. & Espie, A. [2013] Mercia Mudstone Formation caprock to carbon capture and storage sites: petrology and petrophysical characteristics. Journal of the Geological Society, 170, 119–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Armitage, P., Worden, R. H., Faulkner, D. R., Aplin, A., Butcher, A. & Iliffe, J. [2010] Diagenetic and sedimentary controls on porosity in Lower Carboniferous fine-grained lithologies, Krechba field, Algeria:A petrological study of a caprock to a carbon capture site. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 27, 1395–1410.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Armitage, P., Worden, R. H., Faulkner, D. R., Butcher, A. & Espie, A. [2016] Permeability of the Mercia Mudstone: suitability as caprock to carbon capture and storage sites. Geofluids, 16, 26–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Becker, B. W., Baldino, F. & Aleandri, A., [2021] Liverpool Bay Area CCS: An advanced Case Study to Achieve UK's Carbon Neutrality. In: Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference. SPE.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brace, W. F., Walsh, J. & Frangos, W. [1968] Permeability of granite under high pressure. Journal of Geophysical research, 73, 2225–2236.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dewhurst, D. N., Aplin, A. C. & Sarda, J. P. [1999] Influence of clay fraction on pore‐scale properties and hydraulic conductivity of experimentally compacted mudstones. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 104, 29261–29274.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Howard, A., Warrington, G., Ambrose, K. & Rees, J., [2008] A formational framework for the Mercia Mudstone Group (Triassic) of England and Wales. RR/08/004, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, UK, 1–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kirk, K., [2005] Potential for storage of carbon dioxide in the rocks beneath the East Irish Sea. Sustainable and Renewable Energy Programme Internal Report CR/05/127N, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, UK, 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kwon, O., Kronenberg, A. K., Gangi, A. F., Johnson, B. & Herbert, B. E. [2004] Permeability of illite‐bearing shale: 1. Anisotropy and effects of clay content and loading. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 109.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Seedhouse, J. & Racey, A. [1997] Sealing capacity of the Mercia Mudstone Group in the East Irish Sea Basin: implications for petroleum exploration. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 20, 261–286.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Turner, J. P., Berry, T. W., Bowman, M. J. & Chapman, N. A. [2023] Role of the geosphere in deep nuclear waste disposal–An England and Wales perspective. Earth-Science Reviews, 104445.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Williams, J., Holloway, S. & Williams, G. [2014] Pressure constraints on the CO2 storage capacity of the saline water-bearing parts of the Bunter Sandstone Formation in the UK Southern North Sea. Petroleum Geoscience, 20, 155–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang, Y. & Aplin, A. C. [1998] Influence of lithology and compaction on the pore size distribution and modelled permeability of some mudstones from the Norwegian margin. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 15, 163–175.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Yang, Y. & Aplin, A. C. [2007] Permeability and petrophysical properties of 30 natural mudstones. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 112.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Yang, Y. & Aplin, A. C. [2010] A permeability–porosity relationship for mudstones. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 27, 1692–1697.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202532010
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202532010
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error