1887

Abstract

Summary

Environmental Impact Assessment Statements (EIS) for Mining and Coal Seam Gas (CSG) projects are generally required to consider the potential hydrological impacts of faults on surface and near-surface groundwater assets. Three distinct end-member geological scenarios and outlines methods for characterising fault-related groundwater flow within a risk assessment context have been proposed ( ).

This presentation considers the environmental hydrological aspects of risk assessment for mining and CSG developments. Following water resources and environmental risk assessment, we refer to features such as lakes, rivers, groundwater-dependent ecosystems, and valuable aquifers as groundwater assets or simply assets. Damage to a groundwater asset may include (for example) groundwater depletion or changes to the flow regime caused by mining and CSG development-induced pressure changes. Pressure changes may cause increased or decreased flow along pre-existing flow pathways, or cause the activation of new or previously unimportant flow paths. Should this flow be significant enough to degrade the asset, then the flow pathway is called a causal pathway.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202532019
2025-09-14
2026-02-19

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202532019
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allan, U. S., (1989). Model for hydrocarbon migration and entrapment within faulted structures. AAPG Bulletin, 73, 803–811.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bond, C. E., Shipton, Z., Gibbs, A. D., and Jones, S. (2008). Structural models: Optimising risk analysis by understanding conceptual uncertainty, First Break, 26(6), 65–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. DPIE (2020). Narrabri Gas Project, State Significant Development SSD 6367, Assessment Report, New South Wales, Department of Planning, Industry, and Environment, (dpie.nsw.gov.au).
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Iverach, C. P., Cendón, D. I., Beckmann, S., Hankin, S. I., Manefield, M, and Kelly, B. F. J. (2020). Constraining source attribution of methane in an alluvial aquifer with multiple recharge pathways, Science of The Total Environment, 703, 134927, ISSN 0048–9697, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134927.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. KCB-ERM (2017). Western Surat Gas Project, Public Environment Report, Klohn, Crippen, & Berger, ERM, Report 170206_wsgp IESC, https://www.senexenergy.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Attachment-L.pdf.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Murray, T.M., Power, W.L., Johnson, T.J., Christie, G.J. and Richards, D.R. (2019). Validation and analysis procedures for juxtaposition and membrane fault seals in oil and gas exploration. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 496, 145–161, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP496-2018-171.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Murray TA and Power WL2021. Information Guidelines Explanatory Note: Characterisation and modelling of geological fault zones. Report prepared for the Independent Expert Scientific Committee on Coal Seam Gas and Large Coal Mining Development through the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Commonwealth of Australia 2021
     [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202532019
Loading
Inclusion of Faults in Mining and Coal Seam Gas Environmental Risk Assessments
Conference Proceedings 2025, 1 (2025); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202532019
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202532019
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202532019
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error