1887

Abstract

Summary

Underground hydrogen storage (UHS) in porous formations such as depleted reservoirs offers a promising solution for large-scale, long-term energy storage. A key factor controlling storage safety is the maximum hydrogen column height (MHCH) that can be retained beneath the caprock without leakage. This study investigates the geological and physicochemical parameters that govern MHCH, including pore throat size, wettability, interfacial tension, and brine salinity. Using capillary sealing theory and the Laplace equation, we establish a framework to calculate MHCH under varying conditions. Experimental data from the literature are compiled across different caprock lithologies, and a Monte Carlo simulation approach is applied to quantify uncertainties and conduct global sensitivity analysis. Preliminary results suggest that clay-rich caprocks with fine pores and hydrophilic surfaces, such as illite- and smectite-rich shales, can support significantly higher MHCH than coarser or more oil-wet rocks. Additionally, interfacial tension and brine chemistry play important secondary roles, often underestimated in traditional assessments. This work provides a data-driven, probabilistic method for evaluating site suitability and improving the design of UHS systems. By clarifying the critical controls on hydrogen containment, the study contributes to safer and more effective deployment of subsurface hydrogen storage as part of a future low-carbon energy system.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202532034
2025-09-14
2026-02-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ali, M., Pan, B., Yekeen, N., Al-Anssari, S., Al-Anazi, A., Keshavarz, A., Iglauer, S. and Hoteit, H. [2022] Assessment of wettability and rock-fluid interfacial tension of caprock: Implications for hydrogen and carbon dioxide geo-storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(30), 14104–14120.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Epelle, E.I., Obande, W., Udourioh, G.A., Afolabi, I.C., Desongu, K.S., Orivri, U., Gunes, B. and Okolie, J.A. [2022] Perspectives and prospects of underground hydrogen storage and natural hydrogen. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 6(14), 3324–3343.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Espinoza, D.N. and Santamarina, J.C. [2017] CO2 breakthrough—Caprock sealing efficiency and integrity for carbon geological storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 66, 218–229.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ghaedi, M., Østebø Andersen, P. and Gholami, R. [2024] Maximum column height and optimum storage depth for geological storage of hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 50, 291–304.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hematpur, H., Abdollahi, R., Rostami, S., Haghighi, M. and Blunt, M.J. [2023] Review of underground hydrogen storage: Concepts and challenges. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 7(2), 111–131.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hosseini, M., Fahimpour, J., Ali, M., Keshavarz, A. and Iglauer, S. [2022] Capillary Sealing Efficiency Analysis of Caprocks: Implication for Hydrogen Geological Storage. Energy & Fuels, 36(7), 4065–4075.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Iglauer, S. [2022] Optimum geological storage depths for structural H2 geo-storage. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 212.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lankof, L. and Tarkowski, R. [2020] Assessment of the potential for underground hydrogen storage in bedded salt formation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(38), 19479–19492.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu, W., Zhang, Z.X., Chen, J., Jiang, D.Y., Wei, F., Fan, J.Y. and Li, Y.P. [2020] Feasibility evaluation of large-scale underground hydrogen storage in bedded salt rocks of China: A case study in Jiangsu province. Energy, 198.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Miocic, J., Heinemann, N., Edlmann, K., Scafidi, J., Molaei, F. and Alcalde, J. [2023] Underground hydrogen storage: A review. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 528(1), SP528-2022-88.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Miocic, J.M., Alcalde, J., Heinemann, N., Marzan, I. and Hangx, S. [2022] Toward energy-independence and net-zero: The inevitability of subsurface storage in Europe. ACS Energy Letters, 7(8), 2486–2489.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Molíková, A., Vítezová, M., Vítez, T., Buriánková, I., Huber, H., Dengler, L., Hanisáková, N., Onderka, V. and Urbanová, I. [2022] Underground gas storage as a promising natural methane bioreactor and reservoir?Journal of Energy Storage, 47.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Muhammed, N.S., Haq, B., Al Shehri, D., Al-Ahmed, A., Rahman, M.M. and Zaman, E. [2022] A review on underground hydrogen storage: Insight into geological sites, influencing factors and future outlook. Energy Reports, 8, 461–499.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Perera, M.S.A. [2023] A review of underground hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs: Insights into various rock-fluid interaction mechanisms and their impact on the process integrity. Fuel, 334, 126677–126690.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Sambo, C., Dudun, A., Samuel, S.A., Esenenjor, P., Muhammed, N.S. and Haq, B. [2022] A review on worldwide underground hydrogen storage operating and potential fields. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(54), 22840–22880.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Tarkowski, R. [2019] Underground hydrogen storage: Characteristics and prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 105, 86–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Watkins, J., Kaldi, J. and Watson, M. [2022] Geological storage of gas: evaluation of seal properties for containment of Carbon Dioxide, Methane and Hydrogen. Proceedings of the 16th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference (GHGT-16), 23–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Zivar, D., Kumar, S. and Foroozesh, J. [2021] Underground hydrogen storage: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(45), 23436–23462.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202532034
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202532034
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error