1887

Abstract

Summary

Among fault plane geometric attributes, asperities and roughness play an important role on the fault frictional behaviour and further growth. Fault imaging in seismic data has evolved significantly over the past decades, progressing from manual picking of fault traces to the use of seismic attributes, and more recently, to the application of deep learning-based methods. New advances in imaging faults in 3D reflection seismic data has enabled capturing fault plane 3D shape with internal segments. We investigated the structural characteristics of several normal faults in siliciclastic dominated lithology imaged in seismic surveys from the Norwegian Continental Shelf (Barents Sea). Our study followed a four-step workflow: fault imaging and 3D geometry extraction; asperity identification and characterization; throw measurement; and fault roughness analysis. This integrated approach enabled a detailed investigation of the relationship between fault asperities and localized variations in throw and strike along the fault planes. Our results show that fault roughness increases adjacent to asperities, where the throw usually increases and there are sudden changes in the fault segments’ strike.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202532035
2025-09-14
2026-02-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alaei, B., & Torabi, A. [2017]. Seismic imaging of fault damaged zone and its scaling relation with displacement. Interpretation, 5(4), SP83–SP93.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alaei, B., & Torabi, A. [2024]. Fault asperity and roughness, insight from faults in 3D reflection seismic data. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 170, 107145.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. An, Y., Du, H., Ma, S., Niu, Y., Liu, D., Wang, J., Du, Y., Childs, C., Walsh, J. & Dong, R. [2023]. Current state and future directions for deep learning based automatic seismic fault interpretation: A systematic review. Earth-Science Reviews, 243, 104509.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bönke, W., Alaei, B., Torabi, A., & Oikonomou, D. [2024]. Data augmentation for 3D seismic fault interpretation using deep learning. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 162, 106706.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brito, L. S. B., Alaei, B., Torabi, A., Leopoldino-Oliveira, K. M., Lino Vasconcelos, D., Bezerra, F. H. R., & Nogueira, F. C. C. [2023]. Automatic 3D fault detection and characterization—A comparison between seismic attribute methods and deep learning. Interpretation, 11(4), T793–T808.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Caine, JS, Evans, JP, Forster, CB. [1996]. Fault zone architecture and permeability structure. Geology, 24(11), 1025–1028.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Choi, JH., Edwards, P., Ko, K., Kim, YS. [2016]. Definition and classification of fault damage zones: a review and a new methodological approach. Earth-Science Reviews, 152, 70–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnson, L.R., Nadeau, R.M. [2002]. Asperity model of an earthquake: static problem. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92 (2), 672–686.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lay, T., Kanamori, H., Ruff, L. [1982]. The asperity model and the nature of large subduction zone earthquakes. Earth. Pred. Res. 1(1), 3–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Libak, A., Alaei, B., Torabi, A. [2017]. Fault visualization and identification in fault seismic attribute volumes: Implications for fault geometric characterization. Interpretation, 5(2), B1–B16.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Torabi, A., Alaei, B., & Libak, A. [2019]. Normal fault 3D geometry and displacement revisited: Insights from faults in the Norwegian Barents Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 99, 135–155.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Torabi, A., & Berg, S. S. [2011]. Scaling of fault attributes: A review. Marine and petroleum geology, 28(8), 1444–1460.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Torabi, A., Rudnicki, J., Alaei, B., & Buscarnera, G. [2023]. Envisioning faults beyond the framework of fracture mechanics. Earth-Science Reviews, 238, 104358.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202532035
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202532035
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error