1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

Our study introduces a novel isotopologue-based approach for compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA) using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC/HRMS), which extends d¹³C analysis to non-volatile, intact lipids typically inaccessible to conventional gas chromatography–isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC/irMS). By leveraging the distinct imprint of ¹³C-depletion in isotopologue distributions, particularly the M1/M0 ratio, our method enables the reliable identification of ¹³C-depleted methanotrophic lipids in complex environmental systems.

Method development, based on archaeol, a lipid amenable to both GC/irMS and UHPLC/HRMS, demonstrated a strong correlation (R = 0.94) between d¹³C values derived from our isotopologue-based approach and conventional GC/irMS. Subsequent application to lipid extracts from the Guaymas Basin, characterized by the widespread occurrence of anaerobic methane oxidation (AOM), proved highly effective in differentiating biomarkers strongly associated with methane-oxidizing archaea, such as intact archaeol derivatives, from those derived from other non-methanotrophic sources. These findings underscore the potential of isotopologue-based CSIA using UHPLC/HRMS as a powerful new tool for tracing methanotrophic microbial communities and methane cycling in modern and paleo-environments.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202533152
2025-09-07
2026-02-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2025/imog-2025/152.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202533152&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. BlairN. et al., 1985. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 50(4):996–1001.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AbrahamWR., et al.1998. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64(11):4202–4209.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. PancostRD, SinningheDamsté JS.2003. Chem. Geol. 195(1–4):29–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. HinrichsK.-U., et al.1999. Nature. 398(6730):802–805.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Pancost, R.D. et al., 2000. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 1126–1132.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Blumenberg, M. et al., 2004. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101, 11111–11116.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. NiemannH, ElvertM.2008. Org. Geochem. 39(12):1668–1677.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sessions, A.L., 2006. J. Sep. Sci.29, 1946–1961.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. TeskeA. et al., 2002. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68(4):1994–2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Teske, A. et al., 2016. Front. Microbiol. 7.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Shioi, Y. et al., 1991. Plant. Cell. Physiol. 32, 87–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Sohlenkamp, C. et al., 2003. Prog. Lipid Res. 42, 115–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Alvarez, H., Steinbüchel, A., 2002. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 60, 367–376.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hiraishi, A., 1999. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 88, 449–460.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rossel, P.E. et al., 2008. Org. Geochem. 39, 992–999.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Rossel, P.E., et al., 2011. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 75, 164–184.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202533152
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202533152
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error