1887

Abstract

Summary

This study highlights the transformative value of automated drill cuttings analysis as a real-time geoscience tool, especially when downhole tools like MWD and LWD are limited by cost, failure, or extreme environments. By integrating robotics and elemental analysis techniques—namely XRF and LIBS—the system extracts geochemical and mechanical insights from surface-collected cuttings. The process involves automatic collection, cleaning, and pulverization of cuttings, followed by high-resolution elemental analysis. Outputs include modeled mineralogy, brittleness, TOC, elemental gamma ray (EGR), and mechanical proxies, with quality control through standards and barium contamination checks.

Machine learning models, trained using PCA and DFA, classify chemofacies with >90% accuracy. Results from over 864 wells demonstrate broad utility: EGR curves replaced failed MWD in the Haynesville and Eagle Ford; geosteering improved through accurate facies classification; redox proxies mapped TOC-rich intervals; silica spikes identified bit wear zones; clay shifts predicted overpressure hazards; and elemental trends helped map subsalt faults and Jurassic boundaries in the Gulf of Mexico.

This workflow significantly enhances subsurface understanding, reduces non-productive time (NPT), and enables data-driven decisions in real-time. Its field-proven success makes it valuable not only in hydrocarbon development but also in carbon storage and other subsurface applications.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202535005
2025-11-12
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AmosuA., ImsalemM., SunY. (2021). Effective machine learning identification of TOC-rich zones in the Eagle Ford Shale. Journal of Applied Geophysics Volume 188, 104311.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Craigie, N. (2018). Principles of elemental chemostratigraphy: A practical user guide. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71216-1
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Driskill, B., Pickering, J., & Rowe, H. (2018). Interpreting high-resolution XRF data from the Bone Spring and Upper Wolfcamp, Delaware Basin, USA. URTeC, 2901968. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2018-2901968
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ellis, D. V., & Singer, J. M. (2007). Well logging for earth scientists (2nd ed.). Springer Netherlands. (Originally published by Elsevier, 1987)
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Grammer, G. M., & Workman, S. (2013). Integrating depositional facies and sequence stratigraphy in characterizing unconventional reservoirs: Eagle Ford Shale, South Texas. GCAGS Transactions, 63, 473–508.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hentz, T. F., & Ruppel, S. C. (2010). Regional stratigraphic and rock characteristics of the Eagle Ford Shale in its play area: Maverick Basin to East Texas Basin. Search and Discovery Article, 10325.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Larson, T. (2022). Core-based machine learning characterization of Wolfcamp XY and Third Bone Spring Formation across the Delaware Basin, Texas. Bureau of Economic Geology Webinar Series.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Larson, T. E., Loucks, R. G., Sivil, J. E., Hattori, K. E., & Zahm, C. K. (2023). Machine learning classification of Austin Chalk chemofacies from high-resolution X-ray fluorescence core characterization. AAPG Bulletin, 107(6), 907–927. https://doi.org/10.1306/09232220095
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Pearce, T. J., Beasley, B. M., & Wright, D. K. (1999). Chemostratigraphy: A method to improve inter- well correlation in barren sequences: A case study using onshore Duckmantian- Stephanian sequences. Sedimentary Geology, 124(1–4), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0037-0738(99)00009-3
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ratcliffe, K. T., Wright, A. M., & Hallsworth, C. (2004). Chemostratigraphy: A method to improve inter-well correlation in barren sequences—a case study using onshore Duckmantian-Stephanian sequences. Sedimentary Geology, 124(1–4), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0037-0738(99)00009-3
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ratcliffe, K. T., Wright, A. M., & Spain, D. (2012). Unconventional methods for unconventional plays: Using elemental data to understand shale resource plays, part 1. Petroleum Exploration Society of Australia (PESA) New Resources, February/March, 89–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Stüben, D., Kramar, U., Berner, Z., & Eckardt, A. (2005). Phosphate-rich sediments from the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary (Fish et al.). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 224(1–3), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.03.034
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tinnin, B., & Darmaoen, S. (2016). Chemostratigraphic variability of the Eagle Ford Shale, South Texas: Insights into paleoredox and sedimentary facies changes. In J. A.Breyer (Ed.), The Eagle Ford Shale: A renaissance in U.S. oil production (pp. 259–283). AAPG Memoir 110.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Tonner, D., Swanson, A., Hollingshead, R., Hughes, S., Seacrest, S., McDaniel, B., & Leeper, J. (2018). Automation provides unique insights of the rock record and subsurface through the delivery of a robotic sample collection and analysis device. AAPG ACE 2018, Control ID Number: 2833118.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Tonner, D., Hughes, S., & Dix, M. (2012). Wellsite geochemistry: New analytical tools used to evaluate unconventional reservoirs to assist in well construction and smart completions. SPWLA 53rd Annual Logging Symposium, June 16–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Tribovillard, N., Algeo, T., Lyons, T. W., & Riboulleau, A. (2006). Trace metals as paleoredox and paleoproductivity proxies: An update. Chemical Geology, 232(1–2), 12–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Tribovillard, N., Bout-Roumazeilles, V., Algeo, T., Lyons, T. W., Sionneau, T., Montero- Serrano, J. C., Riboulleau, A., & Baudin, F. (2008). Paleodepositional conditions in the Orca Basin as inferred from organic matter and trace metal contents. Marine Geology, 254(1–2), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2008.05.012
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202535005
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202535005
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error