1887

Abstract

Summary

This paper presents an enhanced pore pressure prediction model using a modified Eaton’s equation that integrates a depth-sensitive compaction trend, improving accuracy in both shallow and deep offshore wells. Traditional methods often rely on a linear Normal Compaction Trend Line (NCTL), which leads to inaccuracies across variable lithologies and water depths. The new model incorporates a dynamic NCTL ( Equation 10 ) derived from integrating Eaton’s method with Wyllie’s time-average and Athy’s porosity-depth relationships. Validation across 15 wells from six offshore Nile Delta fields demonstrated improved accuracy compared to conventional approaches, particularly in challenging intervals. Case studies from shallow and deepwater wells confirmed its adaptability and reliability. The model offers a universal framework with tunable parameters, enhancing pore pressure prediction across diverse offshore environments, reducing drilling risk, and optimizing mud weight and casing programs. This advancement supports safer, more efficient drilling operations in overpressured and geologically complex settings.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202535052
2025-11-12
2026-01-22

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202535052
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Athy, L.F. (1930). “Density, Porosity, and Compaction of Sedimentary Rocks.” AAPG Bulletin, 14(1), 1–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Eaton, B.A. (1975). “The Equation for Geopressure Prediction from Well Logs.” SPE Paper 5544.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Mousavi, A., Asef, M.R., & Ghassem Alaskari, M. (2023). “Advances in Real-Time Pore Pressure Estimation Using Well Logging and Data Analytics in Deepwater Environments.” Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 112, 104103.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Sabry, A. (2016). Mud Logging Quality Control and Pore Pressure Prediction Using Geological and Geophysical Data in Selected Fields, Nile Delta, Egypt. Ph.D. Thesis, Mansoura University.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Slotnick, M.M. (1936). “The Interpretation of Seismic Travel-Time Curves in Geologically Complex Areas.” Geophysics, 1(1), 35–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Tingay, M. et al. (2009). “Brunei Basin Pressure Prediction and Overpressure Mechanisms.” Marine and Petroleum Geology, 26(7), 1200–1211.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Van Ruth, P.J., Hillis, R.R., & Meyer, J.J. (2004). “Quantifying Pore Pressure Using Sonic Velocity Data in the Carnarvon Basin.” AAPG Bulletin.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, Y., Liu, H., & Hu, X. (2022). “Integrated Pore Pressure Prediction in Offshore Drilling Using Machine Learning and Physics-Based Models.” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 213, 110396.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Wyllie, M.R.J. et al. (1956). “Elastic Wave Velocities in Heterogeneous and Porous Media.” Geophysics, 21(1), 41–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, J. (2011). “Pore Pressure Prediction from Well Logs: Methods, Modifications, and New Approaches.” Earth-Science Reviews, 108, 50–63.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202535052
Loading
Enhanced Pore Pressure Prediction Using A Modified Eaton’S Equation Across Multiple Offshore Fields And Depths
Conference Proceedings 2025, 1 (2025); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202535052
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202535052
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202535052
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error