1887

Abstract

Summary

Methane emissions are a significant contributor to global warming and their effective detection and monitoring is essential to achieve NetZero goals. The role of methane in global warming is widely acknowledged, prompting initiatives such as the Global Methane Pledge and Oil and Gas Methane Partnership 2.0 to drive meaningful environmental action. Although methane reductions in the energy sector are often considered low-hanging fruit, significant technological challenges remain in detecting and quantifying methane emissions accurately under manageable monitoring costs.

Satellite imagery has emerged as the most promising and cost-effective solution to this issue. However, detecting methane emissions below 1 metric ton/hour continues to be a challenge.

This work outlines a novel methodology of an AI-based system for detecting methane emission locations using Sentinel-2 multispectral satellite imagery. The proposed technology employs at its core a bespoke ensemble of AI models to identify methane emission signals and the distinctive shapes of methane plumes, which are concealed in the short-wave infrared (SWIR) satellite bands. Our system can accurately distinguish methane signal and methane plume shape from the background noise with detection limit of 300 kg/hour. This capability is built upon a unique dataset of real-world methane leak events and leverages public-domain, multispectral satellite data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202539081
2025-03-24
2026-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ali Radman, M. M. (2023). S2MetNet: A novel dataset and deep learning benchmark for methane point source quantification using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 295, 10. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2023.113708
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113708 [Google Scholar]
  2. DanielH. Cusworth, R. M.-D. (2021). Intermittency of Large Methane Emitters in the Permian Basin. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 567–573. doi:10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00173
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00173 [Google Scholar]
  3. IEA. (2024). Global Methane Tracker 2024. Retrieved from IEA, Paris: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-methane-tracker-2024
    [Google Scholar]
  4. JongaramrungruangS., T. A. (2022). MethaNet - An AI-driven approach to quantifying methane point-source emission from high-resolution 2-D plume imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 10. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2021.112809
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112809 [Google Scholar]
  5. Rouet-Leduc, B. H. (2024). Automatic detection of methane emissions in multispectral satellite imagery using a vision transformer. Nature Communications, 15. doi: 10.1038/s41467‑024‑47754‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47754-y [Google Scholar]
  6. Růžička, V. M.-G.-C. (2023). Semantic segmentation of methane plumes with hyperspectral machine learning models. Scientific Reports, 13. doi:10.1038/s41598‑023‑44918‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44918-6 [Google Scholar]
  7. Schuit, B. J.-W.-L. (2023). Automated detection and monitoring of methane super-emitters using satellite data. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 23. doi:10.5194/acp‑23‑9071‑2023
    https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9071-2023 [Google Scholar]
  8. Shine, K. F. (2005). Alternatives to the Global Warming Potential for Comparing Climate Impacts of Emissions of Greenhouse Gases. Climatic CHange, 281–302. doi:10.1007/s10584‑005‑1146‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-1146-9 [Google Scholar]
  9. Varon, D. J. (2021). Atmospheric Measurements Techniques, 14. doi:10.5194/amt‑14‑2771‑2021
    https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2771-2021 [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202539081
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202539081
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error