1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

The study researches the possibility of using the average shear-wave velocity in the top 30 meters (Vs30) as a proxy parameter to predict underground water levels through machine-learning methods. By focusing on a test region in Texas (USA), the research leverages open-source datasets for V 30, underground water depths, and lithology, which are collocated using a cKDTree algorithm to maintain the integrity of original measurements. Three models are employed – a simple linear regression (as a baseline), a Random Forest regressor, and an Extra Trees regressor. While the linear model assumes a direct relationship between velocity and underground water depth, ensemble methods account for the more complex and spatially variable nature of near-surface geological conditions. The workflow is potentially may be transferable to areas where Vs30 data are available but direct hydrogeological measurements are scarce. Future studies could validate this idea in different geological/geophysical settings, incorporate additional engineering and geological parameters (e.g., porosity, permeability), and explore further machine-learning techniques (e.g., support vector machines or neural networks) to increase robustness and accuracy of underground water level predictions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510048
2025-04-14
2026-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2025/monitoring_2025/Mon25-048.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510048&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. CEN (2004). Eurocode 8-design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European standard EN 1998–1, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dovbnich, M. and Viktosenko, I. (2023). Regional model Vs30 and seismic ground types for Ukraine. Monitoring 2023 Conference - Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment. Kyiv, Ukraine. Mon23–159.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Jasechko, S. (2023). Global Groundwater Levels, HydroShare, http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/da946dee3ada4a67860d057134916553
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Li, M., Rathje, E., Cox, B. and YustM. (2020). “Integrated Time Average Shear Wave Velocity to a Depth of 30 Meters (Vs30) Map of Texas”, in Integrated Time Average Shear Wave Velocity to a Depth of 30 Meters (Vs30) Map of Texas [Version 2J. DesignSafe-CI. https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-wera-v784
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Pigulevskiy, P.G., and Svistun, V.K. (2024). Search for fresh water at the border of the Priazov megablock and the Donbas. Geophysical journal. Vol.46. №. - P.111–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24028/gi.v46i3.306483. (in Ukrainian).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Svistun, V.K. and Pigulevskiy, P.G. (2023). Results of geophysical research on Zmiiny Island. Geophysical journal. Vol.45. №.2. - P.134–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24028/gi.v45i2.278341. (in Ukrainian).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Tiapkin, O., Dovbnich. M., Anisimova, L., Skjeltorp, A. and Viktosenko, I. (2024). Seismotectonics and Near-Surface Features for Geohazard Studies in Southern Ukraine. NSG 2024 30th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Sep 2024, Volume 2024. (Helsinki, Finland), p. 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tiapkin, O.K., Onyshchenko, S.A. and Mendrii, I.V. (2016). Near-surface seismic interpretation to reduce the loss of water resources. 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2016: Efficient Use of Technology - Unlocking Potential (Vienna, Austria). Paper Tu P3 05.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510048
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510048
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error